In Re: Jesus Pacheco
Filing
7
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Close Miscellaneous Cases, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/10/19. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
IN RE:
9
10
JESUS PACHECO,
11
SALVADOR JIMENEZ
12
13
14
15
16
On May 13, 2019, the Court received notices from the above-named Plaintiffs requesting relief
from the electronic case filing system at Avenal State Prison.
17
18
) 1:19-mc-00034-SAB; 1:19-mc-00035-SAB
)
)
) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
) CLOSE MISCELLANEOUS CASES
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
On May 16, 2019, the Court directed Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Christopher
Becker, to file a response to Plaintiffs’ requests or to electronically file the complaints.
19
On May 22, 2019, Deputy Attorney General Joanna Hood submitted the declaration of
20
Litigation Coordinator, N. Brown, who indicated that both Plaintiffs had been moved to Modified
21
Community Correctional Facility in Shafter, California, which does not have access to an electronic
22
case filing system.
23
On May 31, 2019, the Court directed that the complaints be electronically filed and a copy be
24
served on Plaintiffs at their new address of record.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
On June 6, 2019, Deputy Attorney General, Joanna Hood, filed a notice indicating that: Jesus
1
2
Pacheco’s (BE-8631) complaint was electronically filed in Pacheco v. Diaz, E.D. Cal. No. 1:19-cv-00
3
774-SAB, on June 3, 2019 and Salvador Jimenez’s (BE-4441) complaint was electronically in Jimenez
4
v. Diaz, E.D. Cal. No. 1:19-cv-00773-EPG, on June 3, 2019.
5
In as much as the above-captioned complaints have now been electronically filed and a new
6
civil rights action has been opened, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the instant miscellaneous
7
cases.
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 10, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?