(PC)Broadnax v. State of California

Filing 42

ORDER DENYING 41 Motion as moot signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/8/2020. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

COTTRELL L. BROADNAX,

12

Case No. 1:20-cv-00043-AWI-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT

13

v.
(Doc. 41)

14

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
On July 13, 2020, District Judge Dale A. Drozd adopted the undersigned’s findings and

17
18

recommendations (Doc. 37) and dismissed this action for failure to exhaust administrative

19

remedies. (Doc. 39.) On September 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for “out of court

20

(settlement).” (Doc. 41.) The Court is unsure if Plaintiff is requesting a settlement conference in

21

this matter. In any event, because this case is closed, the Court DENIES the motion as moot.
Since the U.S. Postal Service returned the order adopting findings and recommendations

22
23

(Doc. 39) and the corresponding judgment (Doc. 40) as undeliverable, the Court DIRECTS the

24

Clerk’s Office to re-serve the order and judgment on Plaintiff.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 8, 2020

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

.