(PC)Broadnax v. State of California

Filing 42

ORDER DENYING 41 Motion as moot signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/8/2020. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COTTRELL L. BROADNAX, 12 Case No. 1:20-cv-00043-AWI-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT 13 v. (Doc. 41) 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On July 13, 2020, District Judge Dale A. Drozd adopted the undersigned’s findings and 17 18 recommendations (Doc. 37) and dismissed this action for failure to exhaust administrative 19 remedies. (Doc. 39.) On September 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for “out of court 20 (settlement).” (Doc. 41.) The Court is unsure if Plaintiff is requesting a settlement conference in 21 this matter. In any event, because this case is closed, the Court DENIES the motion as moot. Since the U.S. Postal Service returned the order adopting findings and recommendations 22 23 (Doc. 39) and the corresponding judgment (Doc. 40) as undeliverable, the Court DIRECTS the 24 Clerk’s Office to re-serve the order and judgment on Plaintiff. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 8, 2020 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?