Bustos v. City of Fresno, et al.
ORDER Regarding Stipulated Protective Order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/31/2021. (Jessen, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:20-cv-00066-DAD-BAM
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED
(Doc. No. 29)
CITY OF FRESNO, a Public Entity;
CHIEF OD POLICE JERRY P. DYER,
individually and in his capacity as Chief of
the Fresno Police Department; ANDREW
HALL, individually and in his capacity as
Chief of Fresno Police Department; and
DOES 1 to 10, inclusive,
The Court adopts the stipulated protective order submitted by the parties on March 26,
2021. (Doc. No. 29.) The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States
District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents subject to this protective order to be
filed under seal must be accompanied by a written request which complies with Local Rule 141
prior to sealing. The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to
show good cause for documents attached to a non-dispositive motion or compelling reasons for
documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665,
677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any approved document filed under seal, the party
shall file a redacted copy of the sealed document. The redactions shall be narrowly tailored to
protect only the information that is confidential or was deemed confidential.
Additionally, the parties shall consider resolving any dispute arising under this protective
order according to the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedures.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 31, 2021
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?