Bustos v. City of Fresno, et al.

Filing 30

ORDER Regarding Stipulated Protective Order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/31/2021. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TEMUJIN BUSTOS,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:20-cv-00066-DAD-BAM
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER

v.
(Doc. No. 29)
CITY OF FRESNO, a Public Entity;
CHIEF OD POLICE JERRY P. DYER,
individually and in his capacity as Chief of
the Fresno Police Department; ANDREW
HALL, individually and in his capacity as
Chief of Fresno Police Department; and
DOES 1 to 10, inclusive,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24

The Court adopts the stipulated protective order submitted by the parties on March 26,
2021. (Doc. No. 29.) The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States
District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents subject to this protective order to be
filed under seal must be accompanied by a written request which complies with Local Rule 141
prior to sealing. The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to
show good cause for documents attached to a non-dispositive motion or compelling reasons for

25

documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665,

26
677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any approved document filed under seal, the party
27
28
1

1

shall file a redacted copy of the sealed document. The redactions shall be narrowly tailored to

2

protect only the information that is confidential or was deemed confidential.

3
4

Additionally, the parties shall consider resolving any dispute arising under this protective
order according to the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedures.

5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

March 31, 2021

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2