Bustos v. City of Fresno, et al.

Filing 30

ORDER Regarding Stipulated Protective Order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/31/2021. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TEMUJIN BUSTOS, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:20-cv-00066-DAD-BAM ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER v. (Doc. No. 29) CITY OF FRESNO, a Public Entity; CHIEF OD POLICE JERRY P. DYER, individually and in his capacity as Chief of the Fresno Police Department; ANDREW HALL, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Fresno Police Department; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 The Court adopts the stipulated protective order submitted by the parties on March 26, 2021. (Doc. No. 29.) The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents subject to this protective order to be filed under seal must be accompanied by a written request which complies with Local Rule 141 prior to sealing. The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to show good cause for documents attached to a non-dispositive motion or compelling reasons for 25 documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 26 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any approved document filed under seal, the party 27 28 1 1 shall file a redacted copy of the sealed document. The redactions shall be narrowly tailored to 2 protect only the information that is confidential or was deemed confidential. 3 4 Additionally, the parties shall consider resolving any dispute arising under this protective order according to the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedures. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara March 31, 2021 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?