(PC) Carroll v. Scott et al

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING 16 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS ; ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, without prejudice, because of plaintiff's failure to comply with a Court Order and to prosecute this case; New Case No. 1:20-cv-00086 AWI-EPG (PC), signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/13/2020. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
CRAIG CARROLL,

No. 1:20-cv-00086-NONE-EPG (PC)

11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

v.
(Doc. No. 16)
SCOTT, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

Craig Carroll (“plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

17

with this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

18

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On September 18, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and

20

recommendations, recommending that “[t]his case be dismissed, without prejudice, because of

21

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order and to prosecute this case,” and that “[t]he Clerk

22

of Court be directed to close this case.” (Doc. No. 16 at 3.)

23

Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and

24

recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed, and plaintiff has not filed

25

objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

27

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

28

the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper
1

1
2
3

analysis.
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on September 18,

4
5

2020 (Doc. No. 16), are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. This case is dismissed, without prejudice, because of plaintiff’s failure to comply

6
7

with a court order and to prosecute this case; and
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case for the purpose

8

of closing the case and then to close this case.

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 13, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2