(PC) Carroll v. Scott et al

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING 16 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS ; ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, without prejudice, because of plaintiff's failure to comply with a Court Order and to prosecute this case; New Case No. 1:20-cv-00086 AWI-EPG (PC), signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/13/2020. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRAIG CARROLL, No. 1:20-cv-00086-NONE-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (Doc. No. 16) SCOTT, et al., Defendants. 15 16 Craig Carroll (“plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 17 with this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On September 18, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 20 recommendations, recommending that “[t]his case be dismissed, without prejudice, because of 21 Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order and to prosecute this case,” and that “[t]he Clerk 22 of Court be directed to close this case.” (Doc. No. 16 at 3.) 23 Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed, and plaintiff has not filed 25 objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 27 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 28 the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 1 1 2 3 analysis. Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on September 18, 4 5 2020 (Doc. No. 16), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. This case is dismissed, without prejudice, because of plaintiff’s failure to comply 6 7 with a court order and to prosecute this case; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case for the purpose 8 of closing the case and then to close this case. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 13, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?