Haro, et al. v. County of Stanislaus
Filing
25
ORDER Re: 24 Stipulated Request for Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/6/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANDREW HARO and MARGARITA
ANAYA,
Case No. 1:20-CV-00095-NONE-EPG
12
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
14
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al.,
(ECF No. 24)
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiffs Andrew Haro and Margarita Anaya and Defendant County of Stanislaus have
filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 24). In light of the
stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A);
Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the
Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
22
23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
January 6, 2021
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?