Scoggin v. Turning Point Central California
ORDER ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations and dismissing action signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/17/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DANELLE RENEE SCOGGIN,
TURNING POINT CENTRAL
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
(Doc. No. 16)
On January 28, 2020, plaintiff Danelle Renee Scoggin, appearing pro se and in forma
pauperis, filed the complaint in this action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 29, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations,
recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute, failure to
comply with a court order, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc.
No. 16.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff by mail at her address of
record and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21)
days from the date of service. (Id. at 6.) On August 10, 2020, the findings and recommendations
were returned to the court by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable. On January 6,
2021, plaintiff filed two change of address forms with the court. (Doc. Nos. 17, 18.) The
findings and recommendations were again served on plaintiff on January 7, 2021 at her newly
listed address of record. To date, no objections to the findings and recommendations have been
filed with the court, and the time in which to do so has now passed. Moreover, the findings and
recommendations served by mail upon plaintiff at plaintiff’s new address of record have not been
returned to the court as undeliverable.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this court has conducted
a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the
findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
adopted in full;
The findings and recommendations issued on July 29, 2020 (Doc. No. 16) are
This action is dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute, failure to obey court
orders, and failure to state a claim; and
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 17, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?