(PC) Wright v. Davis et al

Filing 29

ORDER VACATING 21 Initial Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/12/2021. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 KEITH JEROME WRIGHT, 8 9 10 Plaintiff, v. J. DAVIS, et al., 11 Case No. 1:20-cv-00192-DAD-EPG (PC) ORDER VACATING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (ECF No. 21) Defendants. 12 13 On December 15, 2020, the Court set an initial scheduling conference in this action. (ECF No. 14 21.) The conference is currently set for April 7, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. (Id.) In that same order the Court 15 required the parties to exchange initial disclosures thirty days before the conference and to file 16 scheduling conference statements fourteen days before the conference. (Id.) On February 5, 2021, the 17 Court entered an order referring this matter to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman to conduct a 18 settlement conference on April 8, 2021. (ECF No. 27.) 19 In light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the evolving coronavirus protocols, as 20 well as the upcoming settlement conference, the initial scheduling conference is VACATED. If the 21 case does not settle, the parties shall exchange initial disclosures no later than May 7, 2021, and shall 22 file their scheduling conference statements no later than May 21, 2021. The Court will issue a 23 scheduling order, if necessary, after reviewing the parties’ scheduling conference statements. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 12, 2021 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?