Dalrymple v. FCA US LLC, et al.
Filing
19
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISMISSAL signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/06/2021. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing, the deadline to file documents to dismiss or conc lude this action in its entirety is HEREBY EXTENDED to April 19, 2021. The parties are cautioned that the failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or parties who contributed to the violation of this order. See Local Rules 160 and 172. The parties are again cautioned that additional extensions of time will not be granted absent a demonstrated showing of good cause which will be narrowly construed. (Gonzales, V)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAISY DALRYMPLE,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:20-cv-00230-NONE-BAM
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR
FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE DISMISSAL
v.
FCA US LLC; FRESNO CHRYSLER
JEEP, INC.; and DOES 1-20, inclusive,
(Doc. No. 18)
Defendants.
16
17
18
On May 21, 2020, the parties filed a notice of settlement of this action. (Doc. No. 9.)
19
Pursuant to Local Rule 160, the Court ordered the parties to file appropriate papers to dismiss or
20
conclude this action no later than August 19, 2020. (Doc. No. 10.)
21
On August 19, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation seeking an extension of time to file
22
dismissal documents. (Doc. No. 11.) The Court granted the request and extended the deadline
23
for the parties to file documents to dismiss or conclude this action to October 19, 2020. (Doc.
24
No. 12.)
25
On October 16, 2020, the parties filed a second stipulation seeking a further extension of
26
time to file dismissal documents.
27
extended the deadline to file dismissal to January 18, 2021. (Doc. No. 17.) Additionally, the
(Doc. No. 15.) The Court granted the second request and
28
1
1
Court cautioned the parties that additional extensions of time would not be granted absent a
2
demonstrated showing of good cause. (Id.)
3
On January 5, 2021, the parties filed a third stipulation seeking a further extension of time
4
to file dismissal documents. (Doc. No. 18.) The parties explain that additional time is necessary
5
because Plaintiff’s lead counsel was unable to finalize the settlement before “abruptly leaving the
6
firm on December 23, 2020 without two-weeks’ notice or any information as to the status of his
7
cases.” (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff’s firm’s counsel has “tried to catch up to speed and is currently
8
working with Defendant’s counsel to finalize settlement terms.” (Id.) Despite diligent efforts, the
9
parties are still working to complete all the terms of the settlement agreement. The parties
10
indicate that the subject vehicle has not been surrendered. Once that is complete, Defendant will
11
provide Plaintiff with the agreed-upon settlement amount and Plaintiff will dismiss the case
12
within ten days of payment. The parties hope to complete this process in the next ninety-one (91)
13
days and request that the Court extend the time to file dismissal documents to April 19, 2021. (Id.
14
at 2-3.)
15
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the deadline to file
16
documents to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety is HEREBY EXTENDED to April 19,
17
2021. The parties are cautioned that the failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the
18
imposition of sanctions on counsel or parties who contributed to the violation of this order. See
19
Local Rules 160 and 172. The parties are again cautioned that additional extensions of time will
20
not be granted absent a demonstrated showing of good cause which will be narrowly construed.
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
January 6, 2021
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?