(PC) Curry v. Geddes, et al.

Filing 33

ORDER ADOPTING 28 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DENYING 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, without prejudice, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/11/2020. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TERRELL CURRY,

12

No. 1:20-cv-00235-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

J GEDDES, et al.,

15

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Defendants.
(Doc. Nos. 17, 28)

16
17

Plaintiff Terrell Curry a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this

18
19

civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

20

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 24, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued the pending findings and

21
22

recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No.

23

17) be denied. (Doc. No. 28.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and

24

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id.

25

at 6–7.) To date, no objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed, and the

26

time in which to do so has now passed.

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a

2

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings

3

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

4

Accordingly,

5

1.

6
7

adopted in full; and
2.

8
9
10
11

The findings and recommendations issued on August 24, 2020 (Doc. No. 28) are

Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 17) is denied without
prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 11, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2