(PC) Davis v. Phui et al
Filing
95
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Comply with Local Rule 260(b) signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 08/30/2024. Ten-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KELLY B. DAVIS,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULE 260(b)
v.
(Doc. No. 92)
L. CHANZA, C. CRYER, JR, KHUONG
PHUI, STUART SHERMAN, and
YAGUEZI,
Defendants.
17
18
This is counseled prisoner civil rights case. On August 16, 2024, the Court directed
19
Defendant to file a statement of undisputed facts, as required by Local Rule 260, and directed
20
Plaintiff to comply with Rule 260(b) and “reproduce the itemized facts in the Statement of
21
Undisputed Facts” and admit or deny each statement, as appropriate. (See Doc. No. 92). On
22
August 19, 2024, Defendants filed the required Statement of Undisputed Facts. (Doc. No. 93).
23
On August 29, 2024, Plaintiff filed his own Statement of Undisputed Facts, as permitted by Rule
24
260(b), but failed to comply with Rule 260 and the Court’s Order which required him to
25
“reproduce the itemized facts in [Defendants’] Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit those
26
facts that are undisputed and deny those that are disputed, including with each denial a citation to
27
the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or
28
other document relied upon in support of that denial.” L.R. 260(b) (E.D. Cal. 2023).
1
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
2
1. Within ten (10) days of this Order, Plaintiff shall file an Opposition to Defendants’
3
Statement of Undisputed Facts, in compliance with Local Rule 260(b).
4
2. If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this Court Order, the Court may impose
5
sanctions as appropriate.
6
7
8
Dated:
August 30, 2024
HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?