(PC) Brooks v. Arrizola et al

Filing 37

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant Arrezola's Motion for Summary Judgment Within THIRTY Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/15/2022. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8

LAMAR BROOKS,
Plaintiff,

9
10
11

vs.
ARRIZOLA, et al.,
Defendants.

12

1:20-cv-00476-JLT-GSA-PC
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT
ARREZOLA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
(ECF No. 36.)

13
14
15
16
17
18

Lamar Brooks (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On August 17, 2022, Defendant Arrezola filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF
No. 36.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the
motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l).

19

Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must

20

file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

21

If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order this action may be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure

22

to obey the Court’s order and failure to prosecute.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 15, 2022

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE