(PC) Humphrey v. Howard
Filing
23
ORDER & WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to Produce Shane Humphrey, CDCR# AN-7335, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/13/2020. (Rivera, O)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SHANE HUMPHREY,
Plaintiff,
1:20-cv-00507-NONE-SAB (PC)
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
AD TESTIFICANDUM TO PRODUCE
SHANE HUMPHREY, CDCR #AN-7335
v.
MAURICE HOWARD, et al.,
Defendants.
DATE: November 12, 2020
TIME: 9:30 a.m.
Shane Humphrey, CDCR #AN-7335, a necessary and material witness on his own
behalf in a Settlement Conference in this case on November 12, 2020, is confined at Kern Valley
State Prison, in the custody of the Warden. In order to secure this inmate’s attendance it is
necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to
produce the inmate to appear by video from his present institution of confinement (via
Zoom) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe, on November 12, 2020, at 9:30 a.m.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,
commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to appear by video (via Zoom)
before the United States District Court at the time and place above, until completion of
settlement proceedings or as ordered by the court.
2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and
is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
To: The Warden of Kern Valley State Prison
WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to appear via video (via
Zoom) at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement proceedings, or as ordered
by the court.
FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the
inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 13, 2020
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?