(PC) Brummett v. Sherman, et al.

Filing 56

ORDER SETTING Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 1/3/2025. Settlement Conference set for 2/3/2025 at 08:30 AM at CSP-Corcoran. (This order served as directed.) (Deputy Clerk CRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN RAY BRUMMETT JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE v. 14 E. AGUIRRE, G. BEARD, P. GARCIA, D. LOPEZ, NKIRUKA NDU, and STUART SHERMAN, 15 16 Defendants. 17 Case No. 1:20-cv-00622-HBK (PC) Hearing: Date: Time: Location: Settlement Conference February 3, 2025 8:30 a.m. CSP-COR 18 Plaintiff Melvin Ray Brummett Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 20 in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Upon further review, the Court has 21 determined that this case will benefit from an in-person settlement conference.1 Therefore, this 22 case will be referred to a Magistrate Judge to conduct an in-person settlement conference at the 23 California State Prison, Corcoran (CSP-COR), 4001 King Avenue, Corcoran, CA 93212 on 24 February 3, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. The Court will issue any necessary transportation order in due course. 25 The parties shall each submit a confidential settlement conference statement, as described below, to 26 arrive at least seven days prior (one week) to the conference. 27 28 1 The Court previously declined to set this case for a settlement conference. (See Doc. No. 55). 1 1 The court puts the parties on notice that if Plaintiff has any outstanding criminal restitution 2 obligation, fines and/or penalties, these settlement negotiations shall not be geared towards what the 3 restitution obligation is, but what the value of the case itself is to each side, irrespective of any 4 outstanding restitution obligation. 5 Defendants shall be prepared to negotiate the merits of the case and offer more than a waiver 6 of costs as a reasonable compromise to settle the case. The parties are also informed that an offer of 7 dismissal in exchange for a waiver of costs is not considered good faith settlement negotiations. 8 //// 9 //// 10 //// 11 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 12 1. This case is set for an in-person settlement conference before a federal Magistrate Judge on 13 14 15 February 3, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. at CSP-COR. 2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement shall attend in person. 16 3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. The 17 failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in person 18 may result in the cancellation of the conference and the imposition of sanctions. The 19 manner and timing of Plaintiff’s transportation to and from the conference is within the 20 discretion of CDCR. 21 4. Defendants shall provide a confidential settlement statement to the following email 22 address: settleconf@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement 23 statement to U.S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, 24 “Attention: Institution Settlement Judge for February 3, 2025.” The envelope shall be 25 marked “Confidential Settlement Statement”. Settlement statements shall arrive no later 26 than January 27, 2025. Parties shall also file a Notice of Submission of Confidential 27 Settlement Statement (See Local Rule 270(d)). Settlement statements should not be filed 28 with the Clerk of the Court nor served on any other party. Settlement statements shall be 2 1 clearly marked “confidential” with the date and time of the settlement conference indicated 2 prominently thereon. 3 5. The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length, typed or neatly printed, and include the following: 4 5 a. A brief statement of the facts of the case. 6 b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon 7 which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of 8 prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in 9 dispute. c. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and 10 trial. 11 d. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a 12 history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands. 13 e. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement 14 15 conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to pay. 16 f. If the parties intend to discuss the joint settlement of any other actions or claims not 17 in this suit, give a brief description of each action or claim as set forth above, 18 including case number(s) if applicable. 19 6. If a settlement is reached at any time prior to the settlement conference, defense counsel is directed to file a Notice of Settlement in accordance with Local Rule 160. 20 21 7. The parties remain obligated to keep the court informed of their current address at all times 22 while the action is pending. Any change of address must be reported promptly to the court 23 in a separate document captioned for this case and entitled “Notice of Change of Address.” 24 See Local Rule 182(f). 25 8. A failure to follow these procedures may result in the imposition of sanctions by the court. 26 27 //// 28 //// 3 1 9. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order on the Litigation 2 Office at California State Prison, Corcoran, via facsimile at (559) 992-7372 or via email. 3 4 5 6 Dated: January 3, 2025 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?