(PC) Brummett v. Sherman, et al.
Filing
63
ORDER granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time 62 signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 1/29/2025. (Dispositive Motions filed by 3/24/2025. (Deputy Clerk TEL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MELVIN RAY BRUMMETT JR.,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:20-cv-00622-HBK (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
(Doc. No. 62)
STUART SHERMAN, D. LOPEZ, G.
BEARD, E. AGUIRRE, P. GARCIA, and
NKIRUKA NDU,
Defendants.
17
18
On January 28, 2025, Defendants filed a motion to modify the current Case Management
19
and Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 44) to extend the deadline to file dispositive motions which is
20
currently set for February 6, 2025. (Doc. No. 62). This case is set for a settlement conference for
21
February 3, 2025. (Doc. No. 56). Considering the upcoming settlement conference, Defendants
22
seek an extension until March 24, 2025 to file dispositive motions.
23
Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) provides for extending deadlines for good cause shown, if the request
24
to extend time is made before the original time, or its extension expires; or, on a motion made
25
after the time has expired, if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect. Additionally,
26
Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) permits a court to modify a scheduling order for good cause shown and
27
with the judge’s consent. The Court finds good cause to further extend the discovery and
28
dispositive motion deadlines.
1
ACCORDINGLY, it is ORDERED:
2
1. Defendants’ Motion to Modify the Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. No.
3
4
62) is GRANTED, to the extent set forth herein.
2. The deadline to file dispositive motion is extended to March 24, 2025.
5
6
7
Dated:
January 29, 2025
HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?