(PC) Henderson v. Agame et al
Filing
21
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the court's order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/2/2021. Show Cause Response due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GARY DELMAR HENDERSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
Case No. 1:20-cv-00635-NONE-JLT (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE
COURT’S ORDER
G. AGAME,
14-DAY DEADLINE
15
Defendant.
16
17
On March 9, 2021, the Court issued an order finding service of Plaintiff’s complaint
18
appropriate and directing e-service on Defendant Agame. (Doc. 17.) The Court directed the
19
California Attorney General’s Office to file a waiver of service of process within 30 days of
20
CDCR’s filing of a “Notice of E-Service Waiver.” (Id. at 2.) CDCR filed the notice on April 13,
21
2021, indicating Defendant Agame’s intent to waive service. (Doc. 19.) Although more than 30
22
days have passed, the Attorney General’s Office has not filed a waiver of service.
23
Accordingly, Defendant shall show cause, within 14 days, why sanctions should not be
24
imposed for failure to comply with the Court’s order. Alternatively, within that same time, the
25
Attorney General’s Office may file a waiver of service of process on behalf of Defendant Agame.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to serve this order via email on Supervising
Deputy Attorney General Lawrence Bragg.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 2, 2021
_ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?