(PC) Brown v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 49

ORDER VACATING Initial Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/12/2021. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

MARK ANTHONY BROWN,

8
9
10

Plaintiff,
v.
F. RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

11

Case No. 1:20-cv-00661-NONE-EPG (PC)
ORDER VACATING INITIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
(ECF No. 46)

Defendants.

12
13

On October 22, 2020, the Court set a scheduling conference in this action. (ECF. No. 36). In

14

that same order the Court required the parties to exchange initial disclosures thirty days before the

15

conference and to file scheduling conference statements fourteen days before the conference. (Id.).

16

On January 20, 2021, the Court continued the scheduling conference. (ECF No. 46). The conference

17

is now set for April 26, 2021, at 11:00 AM. (Id.)

18

In light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the evolving coronavirus protocols, the

19

initial scheduling conference is VACATED. The parties are still required to exchange initial

20

disclosures no later than March 29, 2021, and to file scheduling conference statements no later than

21

April 12, 2021. The Court will issue a scheduling order after reviewing the parties’ scheduling

22

conference statements.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 12, 2021

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE