(PC) Brown v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 49

ORDER VACATING Initial Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/12/2021. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MARK ANTHONY BROWN, 8 9 10 Plaintiff, v. F. RODRIGUEZ, et al., 11 Case No. 1:20-cv-00661-NONE-EPG (PC) ORDER VACATING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (ECF No. 46) Defendants. 12 13 On October 22, 2020, the Court set a scheduling conference in this action. (ECF. No. 36). In 14 that same order the Court required the parties to exchange initial disclosures thirty days before the 15 conference and to file scheduling conference statements fourteen days before the conference. (Id.). 16 On January 20, 2021, the Court continued the scheduling conference. (ECF No. 46). The conference 17 is now set for April 26, 2021, at 11:00 AM. (Id.) 18 In light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the evolving coronavirus protocols, the 19 initial scheduling conference is VACATED. The parties are still required to exchange initial 20 disclosures no later than March 29, 2021, and to file scheduling conference statements no later than 21 April 12, 2021. The Court will issue a scheduling order after reviewing the parties’ scheduling 22 conference statements. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 12, 2021 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?