(SS) Moreno v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
27
ORDER re Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Attorney Fees and Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/18/2021. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jonathan O. Peña, Esq.
CA Bar ID No.: 278044
Peña & Bromberg, PLC
2440 Tulare St., Ste. 320
Fresno, CA 93721
Telephone: 559-439-9700
Facsimile: 559-439-9723
Email: info@jonathanpena.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, Gerardo Z Moreno
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
11
12 Gerardo Z Moreno,
Case No. 1:20-cv-00788-DAD-BAM
13
STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD
AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY
FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT
TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT; |PROPOSED| ORDER
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
16 Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
17
Defendant.
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their
20 undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded
21 attorney fees and expenses in the amount of SIX THOUSAND ONE-HUNDRED
22 DOLLARS and 00/100 ($6,100.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28
23 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered
24 on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with
25 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
26
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will
27 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to
28
1 Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability
2 to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset
3 allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After
4 the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are
5 subject to any offset.
6
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
7 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause
8 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Counsel, pursuant to
9 the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to
10 Plaintiff’s counsel, Jonathan O. Peña.
11
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for
12 EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
13 Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall
14 constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or
15 Counsel including Counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in
16 connection with this action.
17
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel and/or Counsel’s firm
18 to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the
19 savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
20
Respectfully submitted,
21
22
Dated: November 12, 2021
/s/ Jonathan O. Peña
JONATHAN O. PEÑA
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: November 12, 2021
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
Acting United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Social Security Administration
1
2
By: _*_Marcelo N. Illarmo
Marcelo N. Illarmo
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
(*Permission to use electronic signature
obtained via email on November 12, 2021).
3
4
5
6
7
8
|PROPOSED| ORDER
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access
9
10 to Justice Act Fees and Expenses (the “Stipulation”),
11
12
IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of SIX THOUSAND
ONE-HUNDRED DOLLARS and 00/100 ($6,100.00) as authorized by the Equal
13
14 Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), be awarded subject to the terms of
15 the Stipulation.
16
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 18, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?