(PC) Torres v. May et al

Filing 24

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 23 Request for Extension of Time to File Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/7/2021. (Reply due by 01/13/2021) (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
ARTHUR TORRES,
12
13
v.
14
15

Case No. 1:20-cv-00839-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO
MOTION TO DISMISS

D. MAY, et al.,

16

(ECF No. 23)
Defendants.

17
18

The Court has read and considered Defendants’ request for an extension of time to reply to

19

Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23). Good cause appearing, IT

20

IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. Defendants have an additional seven days, up to and

21

including January 13, 2021, to file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition.

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 7, 2021

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1