(PC) Torres v. May et al

Filing 24

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 23 Request for Extension of Time to File Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/7/2021. (Reply due by 01/13/2021) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARTHUR TORRES, 12 13 v. 14 15 Case No. 1:20-cv-00839-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS D. MAY, et al., 16 (ECF No. 23) Defendants. 17 18 The Court has read and considered Defendants’ request for an extension of time to reply to 19 Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23). Good cause appearing, IT 20 IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. Defendants have an additional seven days, up to and 21 including January 13, 2021, to file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 7, 2021 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?