(PC) Moore v. Diaz

Filing 31

ORDER vacating Initial Scheduling Conference 30 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/17/2021. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TERRENCE JESSE MOORE, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. HEATHER DIAZ, 11 Case No. 1:20-cv-00865-AWI-EPG (PC) ORDER VACATING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (ECF No. 30) Defendant. 12 On December 4, 2020, the Court set an initial scheduling conference in this action. (ECF No. 13 14 30). The conference is currently set for March 8, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. (Id.). In that same order the 15 Court required the parties to exchange initial disclosures thirty days before the conference and to file 16 scheduling conference statements fourteen days before the conference. (Id.). In light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the evolving coronavirus protocols, the 17 18 initial scheduling conference is VACATED. The parties are still required to file scheduling 19 conference statements no later than February 22, 2021.1 The Court will issue a scheduling order after 20 reviewing the parties’ scheduling conference statements. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 24 February 17, 2021 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 1 28 passed. The parties are also still required to exchange initial disclosures, but the deadline, February 8, 2021, has already

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?