(PC) Clark v. Eaton, et al.
Filing
6
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:20-cv-1159-EFB) to Fresno (1:20-cv-0874-BAM) signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/24/2020. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ERNEST E. CLARK, IV,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:20-cv-1159-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
PATRICK EATON, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that on September 7, 2018 and again on December 13, 2018, he fell in
19
the shower at the Sierra Conservation Center (“SCC”) in Tuolumne County. ECF No. 1. He
20
claims that he is disabled – having lost a leg in a car accident – and that the showers at the SCC
21
did not accommodate his needs. He is now housed at California State Prison, Solano and vaguely
22
alleges the existence of “on-going constitutional violations.” Id. at 15.
23
Although Solano County lies within the Sacramento Division of this court, the crux of
24
plaintiff’s claims – the two falls at SCC - arose in Tuolumne County. Tuolumne County is in the
25
Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, and this
26
action should have been commenced there. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(d). Where a civil action
27
has not been commenced in the proper division of a court, the court may, on its own motion,
28
transfer the action to the proper division. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(f).
1
1
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that:
2
1. This action is transferred to the Fresno Division.
3
2. The Clerk of Court shall assign a new case number.
4
3. All future filings shall bear the new case number and shall be filed at:
5
6
7
8
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
DATED: June 24, 2020.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?