(PC)Moore, Jr. v. Hunt et al
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DISMISSING Action; ORDER for Clerk to Assign a District Judge to This Case for the Purpose of Closing the Case and Then to Close This Case (new case number 1:20-cv-1020-DAD-EPG), signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/7/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EZELL MOORE, JR.,
No. 1:20-cv-01020-NONE-EPG (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
(Doc. No. 7)
HUNT, et al.,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
ORDER FOR CLERK TO ASSIGN A
DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS CASE FOR THE
PURPOSE OF CLOSING THE CASE AND
THEN TO CLOSE THIS CASE
Ezell Moore, Jr. (“plaintiff”), is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 25, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and
recommendations, recommending that “[t]his case be dismissed, without prejudice, because of
Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this case and failure to comply with a court order,” and that “[t]he
Clerk of Court be directed to close this case.” (Doc. No. 7 a 3.)1
Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and
recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed, and plaintiff has not filed
The copy of the findings and recommendations and an order regarding consent to magistrate judge
jurisdiction that were mailed to plaintiff were returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff’s sixty-three-day deadline to update
his address (Local Rule 183(b)) has passed, and plaintiff has not filed a notice of change of address.
objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
are adopted in full;
This case is dismissed, without prejudice, because of plaintiff’s failure to prosecute
this case and failure to comply with a court order; and
The findings and recommendations issued on September 25, 2020, (Doc. No. 7),
The Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case for the purpose
of closing the case and then to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 7, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?