(PC)Moore, Jr. v. Hunt et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 7 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DISMISSING Action; ORDER for Clerk to Assign a District Judge to This Case for the Purpose of Closing the Case and Then to Close This Case (new case number 1:20-cv-1020-DAD-EPG), signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/7/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EZELL MOORE, JR.,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,

No. 1:20-cv-01020-NONE-EPG (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

v.
(Doc. No. 7)
HUNT, et al.,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
Defendants.
ORDER FOR CLERK TO ASSIGN A
DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS CASE FOR THE
PURPOSE OF CLOSING THE CASE AND
THEN TO CLOSE THIS CASE
Ezell Moore, Jr. (“plaintiff”), is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

19

filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge

20

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On September 25, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and

22

recommendations, recommending that “[t]his case be dismissed, without prejudice, because of

23

Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this case and failure to comply with a court order,” and that “[t]he

24

Clerk of Court be directed to close this case.” (Doc. No. 7 a 3.)1

25

Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and

26

recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed, and plaintiff has not filed

27
28

1
The copy of the findings and recommendations and an order regarding consent to magistrate judge
jurisdiction that were mailed to plaintiff were returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff’s sixty-three-day deadline to update
his address (Local Rule 183(b)) has passed, and plaintiff has not filed a notice of change of address.

1

1
2

objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

3

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

4

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

5

Accordingly,

6

1.

7
8

are adopted in full;
2.

9
10

13

This case is dismissed, without prejudice, because of plaintiff’s failure to prosecute
this case and failure to comply with a court order; and

3.

11
12

The findings and recommendations issued on September 25, 2020, (Doc. No. 7),

The Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case for the purpose
of closing the case and then to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 7, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2