(PC) Walker v. Beshara, et al.

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING 42 Findings and Recommendations and Denying 29 , 30 , 31 Motions for Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/6/2022. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY E. WALKER, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. MINA BESHARA, ET. AL., No. 1:20-cv-01050-NONE-HBK ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Doc. Nos. 29, 30, 31, 42) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Jeffrey E. Walker initiated this action as a civil detainee proceeding pro se by 18 filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1.) The matter was referred to 19 the assigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern 20 District of California Local Rule 302. 21 On December 10, 2021, the magistrate judge issued a findings and recommendations 22 recommending that plaintiff’s motions for a temporary restraining order be denied. (Doc. No. 23 42.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any 24 objections thereto were due to be filed within fourteen days. (Id. at 1,7.) Plaintiff has not filed 25 any objections and the time do so has expired. (See docket.) 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 27 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 28 Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 ACCORDINGLY: 2 1. The findings and recommendations issued on December 10, 2021 (Doc. No. 42) are 3 adopted in full; 4 2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (Doc. Nos. 29, 30, 31), are DENIED; 5 2. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for future proceedings. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 6, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?