Donovin Last v. M-I, L.L.C.
Filing
93
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on June 6, 2024, as follows: Plaintiff's request for a stay (ECF No. 92 ) is GRANTED. This case shall remain stayed pending arbitration proceedings. The parties shall file a joint status report regarding the status of arbitration within ninety (90) days of this order.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
DONOVIN LAST, an individual, on behalf
of himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
Case No. 1:20-cv-01205-KES-EPG
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR A STAY
(ECF No. 92).
M-I, L.L.C.,
Defendant.
16
17
On February 12, 2024, District Judge Dale A. Drozd issued an order granting Defendant’s
18
19
motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, and staying this case
20
pending arbitration until July 15, 2024, “unless new authority requires that the stay be extended
21
for so long as the arbitration proceedings are ongoing.” (ECF No. 90 at 22). On May 22, 2024,
22
Plaintiff filed a request for a stay, citing a recently issued Supreme Court decision, Smith v.
23
Spizzirri, 144 S.Ct. 1173 (May 16, 2024). (ECF No. 92). In Spizzirri, the Supreme Court held that
24
“[w]hen a district court finds that a lawsuit involves an arbitrable dispute, and a party requests a
25
stay pending arbitration, § 3 of the FAA compels the court to stay the proceeding.” 144 S.Ct at
26
1178. Defendant has not filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s request.
27
\\\
28
\\\
1
1
In light of this new authority, Plaintiff’s request for a stay (ECF No. 92) is GRANTED.
2
This case shall remain stayed pending arbitration proceedings. The parties shall file a joint status
3
report regarding the status of arbitration within ninety (90) days of this order.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated:
June 6, 2024
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?