Pelayo v. C R Bard Inc et al
ORDER RELATING AND REASSIGNING CASES, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/14/2020. (Martin-Gill, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
New Case No. 2:20-cv-01767-DAD-BAM
ORDER RELATING AND REASSIGNING
CR BARD INC, et al.,
New Case No. 1:20-cv-01264-DAD-BAM
C.R. BARD INC., et al.,
A review of the complaints in the above-captioned cases reveals that they are related
under this court’s Local Rule 123(a) to the following related actions pending before the
undersigned: Broocks v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01228-DAD-BAM; Denzer v. C R Bard Inc.,
1:19-cv-01236-DAD-BAM; Reynolds v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01238-DAD-BAM; Boyer v. C R
Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01243-DAD-BAM; Gonzalez v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01316-DAD-BAM;
Karpenko v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01317-DAD-BAM; Cook v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-014981
DAD-BAM; LaLonde v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01516-DAD-BAM; Baker v. C.R. Bard, Inc.,
1:20-cv-00277-DAD-BAM; Cronan v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 2:15-cv-01418-DAD-BAM; Wilson v.
C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00436-DAD-BAM; Bradburn v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00437-DAD-
BAM; Camarena v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00441-DAD-BAM; Butler v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-
cv-00442-DAD-BAM; Molina v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00443-DAD-BAM; Bond v. C.R. Bard,
Inc., 1:20-cv-00444-DAD-BAM; Krieger v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00445-DAD-BAM; Licea v.
C.R. Bard, Inc., 2:20-cv-00644-DAD-BAM; Turner v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 2:20-cv-00645-DAD-
BAM; Whitaker v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-01668-DAD-BAM; and Leonhart v. C.R. Bard, Inc.,
1:20-cv-01677-DAD-BAM. Accordingly, assignment of the above-captioned actions to the
undersigned and to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe will promote efficiency and economy
for the court and the parties.
An order relating cases under this court’s Local Rule 123 merely assigns them to the same
district judge and magistrate judge—it does not consolidate the cases. The local rules of this
district authorize the judge with the lowest numbered case to order the reassignment of any higher
numbered cases to himself or herself, upon determining that this assignment is likely to effect a
savings of judicial effort. L.R. 123(c). Such good cause appearing here, the court orders that
the two (2) above-captioned actions be reassigned to the undersigned and Magistrate Judge
Barbara A. McAuliffe and that they be related to each of the twenty-one (21) already
related actions listed above. The documents in the above-captioned actions shall bear the new
case numbers above.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 14, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?