Pelayo v. C R Bard Inc et al

Filing 40

ORDER RELATING AND REASSIGNING CASES, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/14/2020. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VANDLEAN MOSIER,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

No. 2:20-cv-01767-TLN-EFB
New Case No. 2:20-cv-01767-DAD-BAM
ORDER RELATING AND REASSIGNING
CASES

CR BARD INC, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

JENNIFER PELAYO,

18
19
20
21

Plaintiff,

No. 1:20-cv-01264-AWI-SKO
New Case No. 1:20-cv-01264-DAD-BAM

v.
C.R. BARD INC., et al.,
Defendants.

22
23

A review of the complaints in the above-captioned cases reveals that they are related

24

under this court’s Local Rule 123(a) to the following related actions pending before the

25

undersigned: Broocks v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01228-DAD-BAM; Denzer v. C R Bard Inc.,

26

1:19-cv-01236-DAD-BAM; Reynolds v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01238-DAD-BAM; Boyer v. C R

27

Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01243-DAD-BAM; Gonzalez v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01316-DAD-BAM;

28

Karpenko v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01317-DAD-BAM; Cook v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-014981

1

DAD-BAM; LaLonde v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01516-DAD-BAM; Baker v. C.R. Bard, Inc.,

2

1:20-cv-00277-DAD-BAM; Cronan v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 2:15-cv-01418-DAD-BAM; Wilson v.

3

C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00436-DAD-BAM; Bradburn v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00437-DAD-

4

BAM; Camarena v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00441-DAD-BAM; Butler v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-

5

cv-00442-DAD-BAM; Molina v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00443-DAD-BAM; Bond v. C.R. Bard,

6

Inc., 1:20-cv-00444-DAD-BAM; Krieger v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00445-DAD-BAM; Licea v.

7

C.R. Bard, Inc., 2:20-cv-00644-DAD-BAM; Turner v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 2:20-cv-00645-DAD-

8

BAM; Whitaker v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-01668-DAD-BAM; and Leonhart v. C.R. Bard, Inc.,

9

1:20-cv-01677-DAD-BAM. Accordingly, assignment of the above-captioned actions to the

10

undersigned and to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe will promote efficiency and economy

11

for the court and the parties.

12

An order relating cases under this court’s Local Rule 123 merely assigns them to the same

13

district judge and magistrate judge—it does not consolidate the cases. The local rules of this

14

district authorize the judge with the lowest numbered case to order the reassignment of any higher

15

numbered cases to himself or herself, upon determining that this assignment is likely to effect a

16

savings of judicial effort. L.R. 123(c). Such good cause appearing here, the court orders that

17

the two (2) above-captioned actions be reassigned to the undersigned and Magistrate Judge

18

Barbara A. McAuliffe and that they be related to each of the twenty-one (21) already

19

related actions listed above. The documents in the above-captioned actions shall bear the new

20

case numbers above.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

Dated:

September 14, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
2