Pelayo v. C R Bard Inc et al

Filing 40

ORDER RELATING AND REASSIGNING CASES, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/14/2020. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VANDLEAN MOSIER, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. No. 2:20-cv-01767-TLN-EFB New Case No. 2:20-cv-01767-DAD-BAM ORDER RELATING AND REASSIGNING CASES CR BARD INC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 JENNIFER PELAYO, 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, No. 1:20-cv-01264-AWI-SKO New Case No. 1:20-cv-01264-DAD-BAM v. C.R. BARD INC., et al., Defendants. 22 23 A review of the complaints in the above-captioned cases reveals that they are related 24 under this court’s Local Rule 123(a) to the following related actions pending before the 25 undersigned: Broocks v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01228-DAD-BAM; Denzer v. C R Bard Inc., 26 1:19-cv-01236-DAD-BAM; Reynolds v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01238-DAD-BAM; Boyer v. C R 27 Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01243-DAD-BAM; Gonzalez v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01316-DAD-BAM; 28 Karpenko v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01317-DAD-BAM; Cook v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-014981 1 DAD-BAM; LaLonde v. C R Bard Inc., 1:19-cv-01516-DAD-BAM; Baker v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 2 1:20-cv-00277-DAD-BAM; Cronan v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 2:15-cv-01418-DAD-BAM; Wilson v. 3 C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00436-DAD-BAM; Bradburn v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00437-DAD- 4 BAM; Camarena v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00441-DAD-BAM; Butler v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20- 5 cv-00442-DAD-BAM; Molina v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00443-DAD-BAM; Bond v. C.R. Bard, 6 Inc., 1:20-cv-00444-DAD-BAM; Krieger v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-00445-DAD-BAM; Licea v. 7 C.R. Bard, Inc., 2:20-cv-00644-DAD-BAM; Turner v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 2:20-cv-00645-DAD- 8 BAM; Whitaker v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1:20-cv-01668-DAD-BAM; and Leonhart v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 9 1:20-cv-01677-DAD-BAM. Accordingly, assignment of the above-captioned actions to the 10 undersigned and to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe will promote efficiency and economy 11 for the court and the parties. 12 An order relating cases under this court’s Local Rule 123 merely assigns them to the same 13 district judge and magistrate judge—it does not consolidate the cases. The local rules of this 14 district authorize the judge with the lowest numbered case to order the reassignment of any higher 15 numbered cases to himself or herself, upon determining that this assignment is likely to effect a 16 savings of judicial effort. L.R. 123(c). Such good cause appearing here, the court orders that 17 the two (2) above-captioned actions be reassigned to the undersigned and Magistrate Judge 18 Barbara A. McAuliffe and that they be related to each of the twenty-one (21) already 19 related actions listed above. The documents in the above-captioned actions shall bear the new 20 case numbers above. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: September 14, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?