(SS) Packer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 07/13/2021. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
AMY NOELLE PACKER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
No. 1:20-cv-01319-HBK
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 41
(a)(1)(A)(ii) 1
(Doc. No. 17)
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
The parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) on
21
July 12, 2021. (Doc. No. 17, “Stipulation”). The Stipulation states the dismissal is with prejudice
22
with each party bearing “their own attorney fees, costs, and expenses associated with the action.”
23
(Id.).
24
Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) in pertinent part provides that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action
25
without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.”
26
A voluntary stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) automatically terminates the action between
27
28
1
The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 9).
1
1
the parties without operation of a court order. Black Rock City, LLC v. Pershing Cty. Bd. of Comm’rs,
2
637 F. App’x 488 (9th Cir. 2016) (citations omitted). Here, the parties have signed and dated the
3
Stipulation to dismiss this action.
4
Accordingly, the Clerk of Court shall terminate all pending motions and deadlines and
5
CLOSE this action to reflect the parties stipulated dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant
6
to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
7
8
Dated:
July 13, 2021
HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?