(PC) Knight v. Nov et al
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING Certain Claims and Defendants signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/7/2021. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BOBBY KNIGHT,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
NKIRUKA NOV, et al.,
15
No. 1:20-cv-01325-NONE-EPG (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
(Doc. Nos. 1, 9, 20)
Defendants.
16
17
Bobby Knight (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
18
this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims. The
19
matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and
20
Local Rule 302.
21
On December 9, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and
22
recommendations, recommending that “all claims and defendants be dismissed, except for
23
Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Edwards for deliberate indifference to his
24
serious medical needs.” (Doc. No. 16 at 2.)
25
Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and
26
recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed, and plaintiff did not file objections.
27
Plaintiff did file a motion to dismiss a claim against certain defendants (Doc. No. 20), which
28
appears to be a statement of non-opposition to the findings and recommendations (at least in
1
1
2
part).
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
3
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
4
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
5
Accordingly,
6
1.
7
8
are adopted in full;
2.
9
All claims and defendants are dismissed, except for Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment
claim against defendant Edwards for deliberate indifference to his serious medical
10
11
The findings and recommendations issued on December 9, 2020, (Doc. No. 16),
needs; and
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to reflect the dismissal of all defendants on the
court’s docket, except for defendant Edwards.
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 7, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?