(PC) Williams v. Castro et al

Filing 66

ORDER Continuing Pretrial Conference Hearing signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/20/2023. Pretrial Conference set for 1/27/2023 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Lawrence, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III Plaintiff, 11 ORDER CONTINUING PRETRIAL CONFERING HEARING TO FRIDAY, JANUARY 27, 2023, AT 9:00 A.M. 12 v. 13 CASTRO, et al., 14 Case No. 1:20-cv-01617-SAB (PC) Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Robert Curtis Williams, III is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter is currently set for jury trial on 19 February 21, 2023. 20 On January 20, 2023, the Court held a pretrial conference in this matter. Deputy 21 Attorney General Peter Lewicki appeared on behalf of Defendants and Plaintiff did not appear. 22 As referenced in the status report filed by Defendants, Plaintiff was transferred to the 23 Sacramento County Jail pending criminal charges on January 11, 2023. (ECF No. 61.) Because 24 of Plaintiff’s recent transfer in custody, the Court continued the pretrial hearing and directed 25 Defendants to investigate whether Plaintiff currently has access and/or custody of his legal 26 property in order to proceed with this matter. As stated at the hearing, the Court intends to 27 proceed with the scheduled motions in limine hearing scheduled for February 8, 2023, at 10:00 28 a.m., and the will issue the necessary writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for Plaintiff’s 1 1 attendance by way of separate order. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the pretrial 2 conference is continued to Friday, January 27, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: January 20, 2023 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?