(PC) Alvarez v. Eaton et al

Filing 14

ORDER RESOLVED 13 Motion to Compel, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 05/09/2022. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 MATTHEW JOSEPH ALVAREZ, Plaintiff, 7 8 9 vs. 1:20-cv-01622-DAD- GSA (PC) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST (ECF No. 13.) PATRICK EATON, et al., Defendants. 10 11 Matthew Joseph Alvarez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 12 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action 13 on November 16, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) 14 On March 24, 2021, the Court issued a screening order dismissing the Complaint for 15 violation of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 8.) 16 On May 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 11.) On March 9, 2022, 17 Plaintiff filed a request for timely screening of his First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 13.) 18 The court ordinarily screens complaints in the order in which they are filed with the court, 19 which strives to avoid delays whenever possible. However, there are hundreds of prisoner civil 20 rights cases presently pending before the court, hence delays are inevitable despite the court’s 21 best efforts. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be screened in due course. 22 Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s request, filed on March 9, 2022, is RESOLVED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2022 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?