Whitaker v. C R Bard Inc et al
Filing
42
ORDER to Extend Stay of Discovery and all Pretrial Deadlines signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/1/2020. Initial Scheduling Conference Continued to 3/2/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Sant Agata, S)
1 Shawtina F. Lewis (SBN 259255)
shawtina.lewis@nelsonmullins.com
2 NELSON MULLINS RILEY &
SCARBOROUGH LLP
3 19191 South Vermont Avenue, Suite 900
Torrance, CA 90502
4 Telephone:
424.221.7400
Facsimile:
424.221.7499
5
Attorneys for Defendants
6 C. R. Bard, Inc. and
7 Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
N ELSO N M ULLINS R IL EY & S CARBOROUGH
A TTORNEYS AT L AW
L OS A NGELE S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
LLP
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
BEVERLY WHITAKER,
11
12
Plaintiff,
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY
OF DISCOVERY AND ALL
PRETRIAL DEADLINES & ORDER
v.
13
C. R. BARD INC., and
14 BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.,
15
Case No.: 1:20-cv-01668-DAD-BAM
(Doc. No. 41.)
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF DISCOVERY AND ALL PRETRIAL DEADLINES
& ORDER
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and (d), Plaintiff in the above-titled
2
action and Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (collectively, “Bard”)
3
(Plaintiff and Bard are collectively referred to herein as “the Parties”), respectfully request that
4
this Court extend the temporary stay of discovery and all pretrial deadlines and continue the initial
5
Scheduling Conference in this case until March 2, 2021 while the Parties continue settlement
6
discussions. In support thereof, the Parties state as follows:
7
1.
This case was originally filed in the State Court of Dallas County, Texas, by a Texas
N ELSO N M ULLINS R IL EY & S CARBOROUGH
A TTORNEYS AT L AW
L OS A NGELE S
resident serving as lead plaintiff, and joined multiple individual plaintiffs, including the instant
9
LLP
8
plaintiff. The case was subsequently removed by Bard to the United States District Court for the
10
11
Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.
2.
On August 17, 2020, the Court issued an Order granting the lead plaintiff’s
12
Unopposed Motion to Sever and Transfer Venue of Out-of-State Plaintiff’s Cases, and the case
13
was transferred to this District and assigned to this Court. (Doc. 21.)
14
3.
On September 15, 2020, this Court found good cause to grant the parties’ previous
15
motion to stay all discovery pretrial deadlines in this action and continue the initial scheduling
16
conference to December 9, 2020 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM). (Doc. 39.) The Parties
17
continue to engage in serious settlement discussions in an effort to reach a global resolution of an
18
entire inventory of cases, which consists of over 700 cases. Accordingly, the Parties jointly move
19
this Court for an order extending the staying of all discovery and pretrial deadlines and continuing
20
the initial Scheduling Conference in this case until March 2, 2021 to allow the Parties to continue
21
to engage in settlement discussions. This will further facilitate settlement discussions and prevent
22
unnecessary expenditures of the parties and judicial resources.
23
4.
A district court has broad discretion over pretrial discovery rulings. See, e.g.,
24
Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574, 598 (1998); accord Thermal Design, Inc. v. Am. Soc’y of
25
Heating, Refrigerating & Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 755 F.3d 832, 837 (7th Cir. 2014);
26
Burns v. EGS Fin. Care, Inc., No. 4:15-CV-06173-DGK, 2016 WL 7535365 at *1 (W.D. Mo. Apr.
27
12, 2016); see also Cook v. Kartridg Pak Co., 840 F.2d 602, 604 (8th Cir. 1988) (“A district court
28
must be free to use and control pretrial procedure in furtherance of the orderly administration of
1
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF DISCOVERY AND ALL PRETRIAL DEADLINES
& ORDER
1
justice.”); see also CMAX, Inc. v. Hall, 300 F.2d 265, 268 (9th Cir. 1962) (district courts possess
2
“inherent power to control the disposition of the causes on its docket in a manner which will
3
promote economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants”).
4
5.
Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c) and 26(d), a court may limit the scope
negotiations do not automatically excuse a party from its discovery obligations, the parties can
7
seek a stay prior to the cutoff date. See Sofo v. Pan-American Life Ins. Co., 13 F.3d 239, 242 (7th
8
Cir. 1994); Wichita Falls Office Assocs. V. Banc One Corp., 978 F.2d 915, 918 (5th Cir. 1993)
9
N ELSO N M ULLINS R IL EY & S CARBOROUGH
A TTORNEYS AT L AW
L OS A NGELE S
of discovery or control its sequence.
6
LLP
5
(finding that a “trial judge’s decision to curtail discovery is granted great deference,” and noting
10
that the discovery had been pushed back a number of times because of pending settlement
11
negotiations).
12
6.
See Britton, 523 U.S. at 598.
Although settlement
The Parties agree that the relief sought herein is necessary to handle the case in the
13
most economical fashion, yet allow sufficient time to schedule and complete discovery if
14
necessary, consistent with the scheduling obligations of counsel. The relief sought in this Motion
15
is not being requested for delay, but so that justice may be done.
16
WHEREFORE, The Parties jointly request that the stay of discovery and all pretrial
17
deadlines be extended and that the initial Scheduling Conference be continued until March 2, 2021
18
to allow the Parties to conduct ongoing settlement negotiations.
19
[Signatures on the following page]
20
//
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
2
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF DISCOVERY AND ALL PRETRIAL DEADLINES
& ORDER
1
DATED: November 24, 2020
Respectfully submitted,
2
NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP
3
4
/s/ Shawtina F. Lewis
Shawtina F. Lewis (SBN 259255)
19191 South Vermont Avenue, Suite 900
Torrance, CA 90502
Telephone: 424.221.7400
Facsimile: 424.221.7499
shawtina.lewis@nelsonmullins.com
Attorney for Defendants
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
5
6
7
8
9
N ELSO N M ULLINS R IL EY & S CARBOROUGH
A TTORNEYS AT L AW
L OS A NGELE S
LLP
DATED: November 24, 2020
Respectfully submitted,
10
FEARS NACHAWATI LAW FIRM
11
12
13
14
/s/ Steven Schulte (as authorized on 11/24/2020)
Steven Schulte (admitted pro hac vice)
5473 Blair Road
Dallas, Texas 75231
T: (214) 890-0711/F: (214) 890-0712
schulte@fnlawfirm.com
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF DISCOVERY AND ALL PRETRIAL DEADLINES
& ORDER
1
ORDER
DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
4
ORDERED that the Parties’ Motion is GRANTED. All discovery and all pretrial deadlines are
5
hereby stayed and extended until the Initial Scheduling Conference. The Initial Scheduling
6
Conference is continued to March 2, 2021, at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before
7
Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe to allow the Parties to conduct ongoing settlement
8
negotiations. The parties shall file a Joint Scheduling Report at least one (1) full week prior to the
9
N ELSO N M ULLINS R IL EY & S CARBOROUGH
A TTORNEYS AT L AW
L OS A NGELE S
Upon consideration of the Parties’ JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF
3
LLP
2
Scheduling Conference. The parties shall appear at the Scheduling Conference with each party
10
connecting remotely either via Zoom video conference or Zoom telephone number. The parties
11
shall be provided with the Zoom ID and password by the Courtroom Deputy prior to the
12
conference. The Zoom ID number and password are confidential and are not to be shared.
13
Appropriate court attire required.
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 1, 2020
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF DISCOVERY AND ALL PRETRIAL DEADLINES
& ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?