Margarita Erguera v. CMG CIT Acquisition, LLC et al

Filing 28

ORDER DENYING as Moot Defendant's 25 Ex Parte Application to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification and Granting an Order Extending Defendant's Time to Respond to the Same signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 01/10/2022. Sixty-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Kevin D. Reese (State Bar No. 172992) Adam V. Truong (State Bar No. 318896) JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 50 California Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4615 Telephone (415) 394-9400 Facsimile: (415) 394.9401 E-mail: Kevin.Reese@jacksonlewis.com Adam.Truong@jacksonlewis.com Attorneys for Defendant CMG CIT ACQUISITION, LLC 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 MARGARITA ERGUERA, an INDIVIDUAL ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 Case No.: 1:20-cv-01744-JLT-SKO [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND GRANTING AN ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE SAME v. CMG CIT ACQUISITION, LLC; CIRCHARO ACQUISITION LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, (Doc. 25) 17 Defendants. 18 19 Based upon changed circumstances, CMG CIT ACQUISITION, LLC’s ex parte request to 20 Strike Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, Or, In The Alternative, Grant An Order Extending 21 Defendant’s Time To Respond, the Court ORDERS: 22 1. The request to strike the motion for class certification is DENIED as MOOT. 23 2. The Defendant SHALL file an opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion (Doc. 24) or a 24 statement of non-opposition within 60 days. 25 3. 26 /// 27 /// 28 The reply, if any, SHALL be filed within 30 days thereafter. /// 1 1 2 4. The hearing on the motion for class certification is VACATED and will be re-set only if the Court determines a hearing is needed. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 10, 2022 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?