Vaden Anderson v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's #9 Request and Motion for Electronic Case Management Credentials Privileges and Pacer Access signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 07/19/2021. (Flores, E)

Case 1:21-cv-00127-NONE-BAM Document 11 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VADEN ANDERSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST
AND MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE
MANAGEMENT CREDENTIALS
PRIVILEGES AND PACER ACCESS

AMAZON.COM, INC., et al.,

15

Case No. 1:21-cv-00127-NONE-BAM

Defendants.

(Doc. 9)

16
17
Vaden Anderson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the instant

18
19

action on January 19, 2021. (Doc. 1.) On July 15, 2021, Plaintiff filed the instant motion seeking

20

credentials and privileges for electronic filing in the Court’s case management (CM/ECF) system

21

and PACER access. (Doc. 9.)

22

Pursuant to the Local Rules, a pro se party shall file and serve paper documents and may

23

not utilize electronic filing unless granted permission by the Court. L.R. 133(a)-(b). A pro se

24

party may request an exception to the paper filing requirement from the Court by filing a

25

stipulation of the parties, or “if a stipulation cannot be had, [a] written motion[] setting out an

26

explanation of reasons for the exception.” L.R. 133(b)(3).

27

///

28
1

Case 1:21-cv-00127-NONE-BAM Document 11 Filed 07/19/21 Page 2 of 2
1

Upon review of the pleadings in this action and the motion submitted, the Court finds that

2

the request does not warrant an exception to the Local Rule. Plaintiff attests that he intends to

3

objectively adhere to CM/ECF and PACER filing rules and guidelines, but Plaintiff fails to

4

provide any reasons for the need to use electronic filing. (Doc. 9 at 1.) Given this, the motion

5

does not comply with the requirement to submit a request explaining the reasons for an exception.

6

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for permission to utilize electronic filing is HEREBY

7

DENIED without prejudice.

8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

July 19, 2021

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2