Vaden Anderson v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's #9 Request and Motion for Electronic Case Management Credentials Privileges and Pacer Access signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 07/19/2021. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-00127-NONE-BAM Document 11 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VADEN ANDERSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST AND MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CREDENTIALS PRIVILEGES AND PACER ACCESS AMAZON.COM, INC., et al., 15 Case No. 1:21-cv-00127-NONE-BAM Defendants. (Doc. 9) 16 17 Vaden Anderson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the instant 18 19 action on January 19, 2021. (Doc. 1.) On July 15, 2021, Plaintiff filed the instant motion seeking 20 credentials and privileges for electronic filing in the Court’s case management (CM/ECF) system 21 and PACER access. (Doc. 9.) 22 Pursuant to the Local Rules, a pro se party shall file and serve paper documents and may 23 not utilize electronic filing unless granted permission by the Court. L.R. 133(a)-(b). A pro se 24 party may request an exception to the paper filing requirement from the Court by filing a 25 stipulation of the parties, or “if a stipulation cannot be had, [a] written motion[] setting out an 26 explanation of reasons for the exception.” L.R. 133(b)(3). 27 /// 28 1 Case 1:21-cv-00127-NONE-BAM Document 11 Filed 07/19/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Upon review of the pleadings in this action and the motion submitted, the Court finds that 2 the request does not warrant an exception to the Local Rule. Plaintiff attests that he intends to 3 objectively adhere to CM/ECF and PACER filing rules and guidelines, but Plaintiff fails to 4 provide any reasons for the need to use electronic filing. (Doc. 9 at 1.) Given this, the motion 5 does not comply with the requirement to submit a request explaining the reasons for an exception. 6 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for permission to utilize electronic filing is HEREBY 7 DENIED without prejudice. 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara July 19, 2021 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?