(HC) Poslof v. Attchley

Filing 38

ORDER DISREGARDING the 37 Objections Received December 30, 2024, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on January 7, 2025. (Deputy Clerk OFR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LONNIE LEE POSLOF, JR.,

12
13

Petitioner,
v.

14

M. ATTCHLEY, Warden,

15

Respondent.

16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:21-cv-0339 JLT HBK (HC)
ORDER DISREGARDING THE OBJECTIONS
RECEIVED DECEMBER 30, 2024
(Doc. 37)

Lonnie Lee Poslof, Jr., a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of

18

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1.) Previously, Petitioner requested a stay of

19

proceedings in this action. (Doc. 28.) The magistrate judge issued Findings and

20

Recommendations, to which Petitioner filed objections on December 18, 2024. (Docs. 32, 35.)

21

The Court performed a de novo review of the matter—including addressing Petitioner’s

22

objections—and adopted the Findings and Recommendations on December 23, 2024. (Doc. 36.)

23

After the Court denied the stay, Petitioner submitted an additional document captioned

24

“Petitioner’s Magistrate[’s] Recommendations” on December 30, 2024. (Doc. 37.)

25

Upon review of the “Objections,” the Court finds the document does not relate to the

26

adjudicated motion to stay. (See Doc. 37 at 1-2.) Beyond the cursory reference in the caption,

27

Petitioner does not mention the specific findings of the magistrate judge or the recommendation

28

to deny his request for a stay. The Court finds the “Objections” are not, in fact, objections.
1

1

Moreover, there is no basis to construe the “Objections” as a motion for reconsideration.

2

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: Petitioner’s purported objections received December 30, 2024

3

(Doc. 37) are DISREGARDED.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 7, 2025

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2