(SS) Johnson Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 28

ORDER Adopting the Parties' Stipulation for the Award of Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/2/2022. (Lawrence, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

LARESE MARIE JOHNSON
ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,

No. 1:21-cv-00341-DAD-BAM

ORDER ADOPTING THE PARTIES’
STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD OF
ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSICE ACT
(Doc. No. 27)

16

Defendant.

17
18

On March 5, 2021, plaintiff Larese Marie Johnson Armstrong filed this action seeking

19

review of a final decision of defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. No. 1.) On May

20

2, 2022, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings

21

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. No. 24.) On August 1, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation

22

with the court in which the parties agree that plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees under the

23

Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $6,508.75. (Doc.

24

No. 27.)

25

Good cause appearing, and pursuant to the parties’ August 1, 2022 stipulation, the court

26

orders as follows:

27

1.

28

Pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in
the amount of $6,508.75;
1

1

2.

After the issuance of this order, the government shall consider the assignment of

2

the EAJA attorney’s fees to plaintiff’s counsel;

3

a.

Pursuant to the decision in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), any such

4

assignment will depend on whether the attorney’s fees are subject to any

5

offset allowed under the United States Department of Treasury’s (“the

6

DOT”) Offset Program;

7

b.

Fees shall be made payable to plaintiff, but if the DOT determines that

8

plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the

9

payment of attorney’s fees to be made directly to plaintiff’s counsel,

10
11

Jonathan O. Peña;
3.

Whether the payment of attorney’s fees is made payable to plaintiff or to his
counsel, the check will be mailed to plaintiff’s counsel’s mailing address at:

12
13

Jonathan O. Peña
Peña & Bromberg, PLC
2440 Tulare St., Ste. 320
Fresno, CA 93721

14
15
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 2, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2