Amaro et al v. Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.

Filing 80

ORDER re: 79 Discovery Stipulation; ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to Terminate Pending 75 Motion for Summary Judgment in Light of Stipulation, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/5/2024. (Rivera, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

RAFAEL MARQUEZ AMARO, et al., on
behalf of themselves and others similarly
situated,

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,
v.
BEE SWEET CITRUS, INC.,

Case No. 1:21-cv-00382-JLT-EPG
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY STIPULATION
(ECF No. 79).
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO TERMINATE PENDING
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN
LIGHT OF STIPULATION

Defendant.
(ECF No. 75).

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Based on the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 79), IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff will be allowed to take the deposition of Jim Marderosian of Bee Sweet. The
deposition will be limited to the issues of the Defendant’s current Motion for Summary
Judgment. Parties anticipate the deposition will take approximately a couple of hours. The
deposition will be taken by remote electronic means.
2. Plaintiff will be allowed to depose and subpoena Defendant’s Farm Labor Contractors for
the purpose of obtaining evidence to oppose Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
3. The parties further stipulate that Defendant hereby withdraws its Motion for Summary
Judgment without prejudice to refile later at Defendant’s discretion sometime after the
completion of Mr. Marderosian’s aforementioned deposition and Plaintiff’s opportunity to

28
1

1
2

subpoena and depose Defendant’s labor contractors.
4. Finally, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate as pending Defendant Bee Sweet Citrus

3

Inc.’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 75) in light of Defendant’s withdrawal of

4

the motion.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated:

February 5, 2024

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2