Amaro et al v. Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.

Filing 80

ORDER re: 79 Discovery Stipulation; ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to Terminate Pending 75 Motion for Summary Judgment in Light of Stipulation, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/5/2024. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 RAFAEL MARQUEZ AMARO, et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. BEE SWEET CITRUS, INC., Case No. 1:21-cv-00382-JLT-EPG ORDER RE: DISCOVERY STIPULATION (ECF No. 79). ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO TERMINATE PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN LIGHT OF STIPULATION Defendant. (ECF No. 75). 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Based on the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 79), IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff will be allowed to take the deposition of Jim Marderosian of Bee Sweet. The deposition will be limited to the issues of the Defendant’s current Motion for Summary Judgment. Parties anticipate the deposition will take approximately a couple of hours. The deposition will be taken by remote electronic means. 2. Plaintiff will be allowed to depose and subpoena Defendant’s Farm Labor Contractors for the purpose of obtaining evidence to oppose Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 3. The parties further stipulate that Defendant hereby withdraws its Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice to refile later at Defendant’s discretion sometime after the completion of Mr. Marderosian’s aforementioned deposition and Plaintiff’s opportunity to 28 1 1 2 subpoena and depose Defendant’s labor contractors. 4. Finally, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate as pending Defendant Bee Sweet Citrus 3 Inc.’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 75) in light of Defendant’s withdrawal of 4 the motion. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: February 5, 2024 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?