Rosemary H. Mullins v. County of Fresno et al

Filing 49

ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/09/2024. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the May 6, 2022 scheduling order, as amended on February 16, 2023; May 8, 2023; December 22, 2023; and April 22, 2024 is amended as follows: Pre-Trial Conference: June 16, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 6 (KES); Trial: August 12, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6 (KES). The May 6, 2022 scheduling order, as previously amended, shall remain in effect in all other respects. (Nguyen, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSEMARY HINOJOSA MULLINS, 12 13 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:21-cv-00405-KES-SAB ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 A scheduling order for this matter issued on May 6, 2022. (ECF No. 25.) The scheduling 19 order was amended on February 16, 2023; May 8, 2023; and December 22, 2023. (ECF Nos. 30, 20 35, 42.) On April 22, 2024, the scheduling order was amended at the stipulation of the parties, 21 and they were directed to file a joint scheduling report proposing trial dates. (ECF No. 46.) On 22 May 7, 2024, the parties filed a stipulation proposing three dates for the trial in this matter. (ECF 23 No. 48.) 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the May 6, 2022 scheduling order, as 25 amended on February 16, 2023; May 8, 2023; December 22, 2023; and April 22, 2024 is 26 amended as follows: 27 Pre-Trial Conference: June 16, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 6 (KES) 28 Trial: August 12, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6 (KES) 1 1 2 The May 6, 2022 scheduling order, as previously amended, shall remain in effect in all other respects. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2024 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?