Weil v. Raisin City Elementary School District, et al.
Filing
152
ORDER re: STIPULATION to Amend Briefing Schedule and Page Limits Regarding Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment 151 signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/27/2025. (Deputy Clerk TEL)
WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC
1 265 East River Park Circle, Suite 310
Fresno, California 93720
(559) 233-4800
Facsimile:
(559) 233-9330
Scott D. Laird #190122
slaird@wjhattorneys.com
Amanda G. Hebesha #234214
ahebesha@wjhattorneys.com
2 Telephone:
3
4
5
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff BRENDA J. WEIL
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
***
11 BRENDA J. WEIL, an individual,
Case No. 1:21-cv-00500-JLT-EPG
12
[Removal from Superior Court of California,
County of Fresno, Case No. 21CECG00307]
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
RAISIN CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
15 DISTRICT; FRESNO COUNTY
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS; and
16 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
17
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
PAGE LIMITS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PURSUANT TO COURT’S MINUTE ORDER
(ECF NO. 150)
Defendants.
18
Complaint Filed: February 2, 2021
1st Amended Complaint Filed: September 29, 2021
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{8329/004/01562417.DOCX}
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO COURT’S MINUTE ORDER (ECF NO. 150)
STIPULATION
1
2
In accordance with this Court’s January 14, 2025 Minute Order (ECF No. 150), and having met
3 and conferred via their respective counsels of record, Plaintiff, BRENDA J. WEIL (“Plaintiff”), on the
4 one hand, and Defendants, RAISIN CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT (“RCESD”) and
5 FRESNO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS (“FCSS” and collectively with RCESD,
6 “Defendants”), on the other hand, hereby stipulate as follows:
7
1.
Plaintiff shall, no later than February 7, 2025, file an amended Opposition to FCSS’ MSJ
8 that is no more than 37 pages in length;
9
2.
Plaintiff shall, no later than February 7, 2025, file an amended Opposition to RCESD’s
10 MSJ that is no more than 28 pages in length;
11
3.
The page limit for FCSS’ Reply to Plaintiff’s forthcoming amended Opposition to FCSS’
12 MSJ is extended a reciprocal amount (up to 12 additional pages);
13
4.
The page limit for RCESD’s Reply to Plaintiff’s forthcoming amended Opposition to
14 RCESD’s MSJ is extended a reciprocal amount (up to 3 additional pages); and
15
5.
Defendants shall file their Replies no later than March 21, 2025.
16 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17
18 Dated: January 24, 2025
WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC
19
20
By: /s/ Scott D. Laird ____________________
Scott D. Laird
Amanda G. Hebesha
Attorneys for Plaintiff BRENDA J. WEIL
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{8329/004/01562417.DOCX}
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO COURT’S MINUTE ORDER (ECF NO. 150)
1
Dated: January 24, 2025
FENTON & KELLER
A Professional Corporation
2
3
By: /s/ Emmanuel Parea Jimenez ___________
Christopher E. Panetta
Emmanuel Perea Jimenez
Attorneys for Defendant RAISIN CITY
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
4
5
6
7
8
Dated: January 24, 2025
JOHNSON SCHACHTER & LEWIS
A Professional Law Corporation
9
10
By: /s/ Kellie M. Murphy _________________
Kellie M. Murphy
Kristen M. Caprino
Attorneys for Defendant FRESNO COUNTY
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{8329/004/01562417.DOCX}
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO COURT’S MINUTE ORDER (ECF NO. 150)
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the Court’s January 14, 2025 Minute Order (ECF No. 150) and the stipulation of
3 counsel for Plaintiff, BRENDA J. WEIL (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants, RAISIN CITY ELEMENTARY
4 SCHOOL DISTRICT (“RCESD”) and FRESNO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS
5 (“FCSS” and collectively with RCESD, “Defendants”), and good cause appearing,
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
7
1.
Plaintiff has until February 7, 2025 to file an amended Opposition to FCSS’ Motion for
8 Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication (“FCSS’ MSJ”) that is no more than
9 thirty-seven (37) pages in length;
10
2.
Plaintiff has until February 7, 2025 to file an amended Opposition to RCESD’s Motion
11 for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, for Partial Summary Judgment/Summary Adjudication
12 (“RCESD’s MSJ” and collectively with FCSS’ MSJ, “Defendants’ Summary Judgment Motions”) that
13 is no more than twenty-eight (28) pages in length;
14
3.
The page limit for FCSS’ Reply to Plaintiff’s forthcoming amended Opposition to FCSS’
15 MSJ is extended a reciprocal amount (up to 12 additional pages);
16
4.
The page limit for RCESD’s Reply to Plaintiff’s forthcoming amended Opposition to
17 RCESD’s MSJ is extended a reciprocal amount (up to 3 additional pages); and
18
5.
Defendants shall file their Replies no later than March 21, 2025.
19 IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
Dated:
January 27, 2025
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{8329/004/01562417.DOCX}
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO COURT’S MINUTE ORDER (ECF NO. 150)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?