Weil v. Raisin City Elementary School District, et al.

Filing 152

ORDER re: STIPULATION to Amend Briefing Schedule and Page Limits Regarding Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment 151 signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/27/2025. (Deputy Clerk TEL)

Download PDF
WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC 1 265 East River Park Circle, Suite 310 Fresno, California 93720 (559) 233-4800 Facsimile: (559) 233-9330 Scott D. Laird #190122 slaird@wjhattorneys.com Amanda G. Hebesha #234214 ahebesha@wjhattorneys.com 2 Telephone: 3 4 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff BRENDA J. WEIL 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 *** 11 BRENDA J. WEIL, an individual, Case No. 1:21-cv-00500-JLT-EPG 12 [Removal from Superior Court of California, County of Fresno, Case No. 21CECG00307] 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 RAISIN CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 15 DISTRICT; FRESNO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS; and 16 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 17 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO COURT’S MINUTE ORDER (ECF NO. 150) Defendants. 18 Complaint Filed: February 2, 2021 1st Amended Complaint Filed: September 29, 2021 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {8329/004/01562417.DOCX} STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO COURT’S MINUTE ORDER (ECF NO. 150) STIPULATION 1 2 In accordance with this Court’s January 14, 2025 Minute Order (ECF No. 150), and having met 3 and conferred via their respective counsels of record, Plaintiff, BRENDA J. WEIL (“Plaintiff”), on the 4 one hand, and Defendants, RAISIN CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT (“RCESD”) and 5 FRESNO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS (“FCSS” and collectively with RCESD, 6 “Defendants”), on the other hand, hereby stipulate as follows: 7 1. Plaintiff shall, no later than February 7, 2025, file an amended Opposition to FCSS’ MSJ 8 that is no more than 37 pages in length; 9 2. Plaintiff shall, no later than February 7, 2025, file an amended Opposition to RCESD’s 10 MSJ that is no more than 28 pages in length; 11 3. The page limit for FCSS’ Reply to Plaintiff’s forthcoming amended Opposition to FCSS’ 12 MSJ is extended a reciprocal amount (up to 12 additional pages); 13 4. The page limit for RCESD’s Reply to Plaintiff’s forthcoming amended Opposition to 14 RCESD’s MSJ is extended a reciprocal amount (up to 3 additional pages); and 15 5. Defendants shall file their Replies no later than March 21, 2025. 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 18 Dated: January 24, 2025 WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC 19 20 By: /s/ Scott D. Laird ____________________ Scott D. Laird Amanda G. Hebesha Attorneys for Plaintiff BRENDA J. WEIL 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {8329/004/01562417.DOCX} 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO COURT’S MINUTE ORDER (ECF NO. 150) 1 Dated: January 24, 2025 FENTON & KELLER A Professional Corporation 2 3 By: /s/ Emmanuel Parea Jimenez ___________ Christopher E. Panetta Emmanuel Perea Jimenez Attorneys for Defendant RAISIN CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: January 24, 2025 JOHNSON SCHACHTER & LEWIS A Professional Law Corporation 9 10 By: /s/ Kellie M. Murphy _________________ Kellie M. Murphy Kristen M. Caprino Attorneys for Defendant FRESNO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {8329/004/01562417.DOCX} 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO COURT’S MINUTE ORDER (ECF NO. 150) [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the Court’s January 14, 2025 Minute Order (ECF No. 150) and the stipulation of 3 counsel for Plaintiff, BRENDA J. WEIL (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants, RAISIN CITY ELEMENTARY 4 SCHOOL DISTRICT (“RCESD”) and FRESNO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS 5 (“FCSS” and collectively with RCESD, “Defendants”), and good cause appearing, 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. Plaintiff has until February 7, 2025 to file an amended Opposition to FCSS’ Motion for 8 Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication (“FCSS’ MSJ”) that is no more than 9 thirty-seven (37) pages in length; 10 2. Plaintiff has until February 7, 2025 to file an amended Opposition to RCESD’s Motion 11 for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, for Partial Summary Judgment/Summary Adjudication 12 (“RCESD’s MSJ” and collectively with FCSS’ MSJ, “Defendants’ Summary Judgment Motions”) that 13 is no more than twenty-eight (28) pages in length; 14 3. The page limit for FCSS’ Reply to Plaintiff’s forthcoming amended Opposition to FCSS’ 15 MSJ is extended a reciprocal amount (up to 12 additional pages); 16 4. The page limit for RCESD’s Reply to Plaintiff’s forthcoming amended Opposition to 17 RCESD’s MSJ is extended a reciprocal amount (up to 3 additional pages); and 18 5. Defendants shall file their Replies no later than March 21, 2025. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: January 27, 2025 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {8329/004/01562417.DOCX} 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO COURT’S MINUTE ORDER (ECF NO. 150)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?