Avalos v. Southern Pacpizza, LLC et al

Filing 12

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND FOR CONTINUANCE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/14/2021(Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE AVALOS, Plaintiff, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND FOR CONTINUANCE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE v. 13 14 Case No. 1:21-cv-00547-NONE-SAB SOUTHERN PACPIZZA, LLC, et al., (ECF No. 11) 15 Defendants. 16 17 On July 13, 2021, Plaintiff filed a status report requesting an extension of time to serve a 18 defendant named Catherine Mellow, and requesting a continuance of the scheduling conference. 19 (ECF No. 11.) The Court construes the filing as a motion, and the Court shall deny the motion as 20 no such defendant is named in this action, and it appears Plaintiff filed this request under the 21 wrong case number. The has Court already continued the scheduling conference in this action 22 and granted an extension to serve certain defendants on July 12, 2021, pursuant to Plaintiff’s 23 request. (ECF Nos. 9, 10.) 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time 1 2 to serve and for a continuance of the scheduling conference filed on July 13, 2021 (ECF No. 11), 3 is DENIED. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: July 14, 2021 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?