(PC) Rodriguez v. Pfeiffer et al

Filing 24

ORDER DISCHARGING 21 Order Requiring Plaintiff to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Comply With a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/17/2021. (Rivera, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MANUEL RODRIGUEZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al.,

15

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER
REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH A COURT ORDER

Defendants.
(ECF No. 21)

16

Plaintiff Manuel Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”), proceeding through counsel, filed this action

17
18

Case No. 1:21-cv-00572-NONE-EPG (PC)

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 5, 2021. (ECF No. 1.)
On November 15, 2021, after Plaintiff failed to file his First Amended Complaint by the

19
20

applicable deadline, the Court entered an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause why this case

21

should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. (ECF

22

No. 21.) Plaintiff was directed to file either a written response or an amended complaint within

23

fourteen days. (Id.) On November 16, 2021, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. (ECF No.

24

22.)

25

////

26

////

27

////

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s order (ECF No. 21) requiring

2

Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure

3

to comply with a court order is DISCHARGED.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 17, 2021

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2