(PC) Blackgold v. KVSP Case Records et al
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Randomly Assign a District Judge to this Action; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Denial of Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 06/03/2021. Referred to Judge Unassigned; Objections to F&R due by 6/21/2021.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SUTEN BLACKGOLD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON CASE
RECORDS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:21-cv-00857-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO
THIS ACTION
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
(ECF No. 2)
Plaintiff Suten Blackgold is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
1983.
Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on May 28, 2021, along with a motion to proceed in forma
pauperis.
22
I.
23
LEGAL STANDARD
24
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) permits a plaintiff to bring a civil action “without prepayment of fees or
25
security thereof” if the plaintiff submits a financial affidavit that demonstrates the plaintiff's “is unable
26
to pay such fees or give security therefor.” A prisoner seeking to bring a civil action must, in addition
27
to filing an affidavit, “submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement ... for the 6-month
28
1
1
period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint ... obtained from the appropriate official of
2
each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).
3
II.
4
DISCUSSION
5
Plaintiff has filed an application declaring that, due to his poverty, he is unable to pre-pay the
6
full amount of fees and costs for these proceedings or give security therefor, and that he believes that
7
he is entitled to the relief sought in his complaint. On June 2, 2021, the Court received a certified
8
inmate statement report by an officer at Kern Valley State Prison, where Plaintiff is currently housed.1
9
(ECF No. 6.) The statement provides the activity in Plaintiff's inmate trust account for the entire six-
10
month period preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's certified inmate statement report
11
indicates that he currently has an available sum of $1,235.61 on account to his credit at Kern Valley
12
State Prison. Further, the statement report indicates that, on April 28, 2021, the sum of $1,400.00 was
13
deposited to Plaintiff’s account. Although the certified trust account statement report indicates that
14
Plaintiff has an encumbrance of $0.83, obligations for prior case filing fees in the amount of
15
$1,093.00, and a total restitution fine in the amount of $600.00, the available balance in Plaintiff’s
16
account reflects that he can pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action.
17
Based on the foregoing, the information that Plaintiff has provided to the Court reflects that he
18
is financially able to pre-pay the entire filing fee to commence this action. Although the Ninth Circuit
19
Court of Appeals has held that “the filing fee ... should not take the prisoner's last dollar,” Olivares v.
20
Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112 (9th Cir. 1995), in these circumstances, it appears Plaintiff has sufficient
21
funds to pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee with money left over. Should Plaintiff have additional
22
information to provide the Court, or should his available balance change by the time he receives this
23
order, he may notify the Court. However, the Court has the authority to consider any reasons and
24
circumstances for any change in Plaintiff's available assets and funds. See also Collier v. Tatum, 722
25
26
27
28
1
The Court takes judicial notice of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation website reflects that
Plaintiff’s State Prison Identification Number AS8775 lists his name as Mitchell Quintin Grady-the number under which
the trust account statement was provided. See https://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/
2
1
F.2d 653, 656 (11th Cir. 1983) (district court may consider an unexplained decrease in an inmate's
2
trust account, or whether an inmate's account has been depleted intentionally to avoid court costs).
3
Therefore, Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis must be denied. If Plaintiff wishes to
4
proceed with this action, Plaintiff must pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee in full.
5
III.
6
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court to randomly assign a
8
Fresno District Judge to this action.
Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:
9
10
1.
Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 2), be DENIED; and
11
2.
Plaintiff be ordered to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full in order to proceed with this
action.
12
These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
13
14
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days
15
after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections
16
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and
17
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that the failure to file objections within the specified time may
18
result in the waiver of the “right to challenge the magistrate's factual findings” on appeal. Wilkerson v.
19
Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir.
20
1991)).
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Dated:
24
June 3, 2021
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?