Gray v. City of Oakdale et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING Extension of Time for County of Stanislaus to Respond to Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/11/2022. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRANDON GRAY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

Case No. 1:21-cv-01086-JLT-BAM
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME FOR COUNTY OF
STANISLAUS TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

CITY OF OAKDALE, et al.,
(Doc. 21)

15

Defendants.

16
17
On January 6, 2022, Plaintiff Brandon Gray and Defendant County of Stanislaus filed a

18
19

stipulation to extend the time for Defendant County of Stanislaus to file a responsive pleading to

20

the complaint. (Doc. 21.) The parties explain that an extension of time is necessary to allow

21

counsel to meet and confer regarding the complaint, “while plaintiff seeks further information

22

regarding whether the COUNTY and its to-be-identified DOE employees will remain in the

23

case.” (Id.) The parties seek to hold the case against the County and its employees in abeyance,

24

“while the investigation and discovery is conducted to ascertain and confirm who the responsible

25

parties and municipalities are.” (Id. at 2.) To facilitate the early exchange of information, the

26

parties recently submitted a protective order, and they report that additional time is necessary to

27

allow the disclosure and review of documents. (Id.)

28

///
1

Having considered the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the request to

1
2

continue Defendant County of Stanislaus’ responsive pleading deadline is GRANTED.

3

Defendant County of Stanislaus’ deadline to respond to the complaint is extended to February 11,

4

2022.

5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

January 11, 2022

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2