Doe v. Adams et al

Filing 18

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE STATUS REPORT signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/19/2021. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within five (5) days of the date of entry of this order, Plaintiff shall file a status report regarding Defe ndant Timothy Beach or a request for entry of default against Defendant Timothy Beach, as well as a status report informing the Court of the status of service on the remaining Defendants in this action. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with this order may result in the issuance of sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action, as well as a recommendation of dismissal of the unserved Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (Gonzales, V)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JANE DOE, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 1:21-cv-01103-NONE-SAB ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE STATUS REPORT v. FIVE DAY DEADLINE 14 DERRAL ADAMS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This action was filed on July 20, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) Summonses were issued on the 18 same date. (ECF Nos. 3, 4.) The only summons returned executed thus far pertains to 19 Defendant Timothy Beach. (ECF No. 8.) On August 19, 2021, the Court extended the time for 20 Timothy Beach to file a responsive pleading until October 14, 2021. (ECF No. 9.) On October 21 13, 2021, the Court granted a stipulated request to continue the scheduling conference until 22 December 7, 2021. (ECF No. 11.) In the October 13, 2021 order, the Court reminded Plaintiff 23 that the deadline to complete service under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) was nearly 24 expired. On October 15, 2021, the Court granted Defendant Timothy Beach’s unopposed motion 25 to extend the time to file a responsive pleading until November 11, 2021, and again reminded 26 Plaintiff of the approaching deadline under Rule 4(m). (ECF No. 13.) 27 The deadline for Defendant Timothy Beach to file a responsive pleading has expired, and 28 no further motion or stipulation to extend the time has been filed, and no request for entry of 1 1 default has been filed. Additionally, no executed summonses have yet to be filed demonstrating 2 service as to the remaining Defendants in this action, and the deadline to do so has expired. See 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (“If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the 4 court--on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff--must dismiss the action without 5 prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.”). The 6 Court finds that it does not serve the interest of judicial economy to hold the mandatory 7 scheduling conference unless the Defendant has filed a responsive pleading and the parties are 8 ready to proceed into scheduling. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within five (5) days of the date of entry of 9 10 this order, Plaintiff shall file a status report regarding Defendant Timothy Beach or a request for 11 entry of default against Defendant Timothy Beach, as well as a status report informing the Court 12 of the status of service on the remaining Defendants in this action. Plaintiff is advised that 13 failure to comply with this order may result in the issuance of sanctions, up to and including 14 dismissal of this action, as well as a recommendation of dismissal of the unserved Defendants 15 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: November 19, 2021 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?