(SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER Extending Deadline to File Motion for Summary Judgment re 20 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/16/2022. Motion for Summary Judgment due by 10/7/2022. (Lawrence, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MARTIN MARTINEZ, 11 12 13 14 Case No. 1:21-cv-01231-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. (ECF No. 20) 15 16 17 On August 13, 2021, Plaintiff Martin Martinez, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint for 18 19 20 21 judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding Plaintiff’s application for disability benefits. (ECF No. 1). Since then, the Court has granted Plaintiff three extensions of time to file a motion for summary judgment, with such motion most recently being do no by later than September 16, 2022. (ECF Nos. 13, 15, 22 18). Notably, the Court’s last order warned that “Plaintiff will need to offer compelling reasons to 23 obtain any future extension of time to file his motion for summary judgment.” (ECF No. 18, p. 2). 24 Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s “request to file my motion for summary judgment,” 25 stating, “With my pro se status, I have found this process at times difficult. After carefully 26 looking over your letter and with [the] assistance of my mother, we uncovered that an additional 27 form had to be filed and we had missed. We found the form on your website and it is filled out 28 and attached to this letter.” (ECF No. 20) (capitalization altered). It is unclear what Plaintiff 1 1 intends by this filing. Plaintiff has not attached any motion for summary judgment or a form for 2 the Clerk of Court to file, nor does his filing specifically request an extension of time to file a 3 motion for summary judgment. 4 5 6 7 8 9 In light of the ambiguity presented and Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court will grant Plaintiff one final brief extension to file a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff shall file by no later than October 7, 2022, a motion for summary judgment. All other deadlines in the Court’s scheduling order are extended accordingly. 2. The motion for summary judgment must contain argument regarding why Plaintiff was improperly denied disability benefits. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a 10 copy of the scheduling order (ECF No. 5), which advises what must be contained in the 11 12 13 14 15 motion for summary judgment (also called an opening brief). 3. Given that this is the fourth extension granted for Plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff will not be granted any further extensions. 4. And if Plaintiff again fails to file a motion for summary judgment containing substantive argument regarding the denial of disability benefits, this case will be dismissed. 16 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 16, 2022 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?