(SS) Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 12

STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 05/06/2022. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
6 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney PETER THOMPSON Acting Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration PATRICK WILLIAM SNYDER Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (510) 970-4858 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Patrick.Snyder@ssa.gov 7 Attorneys for Defendant 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 VIRGINIA ROSA GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI1, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:21-cv-01252-SKO (SS) STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; ORDER (Doc. 11) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned 20 21 attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that this action be remanded for further 22 administrative action pursuant to the Social Security Act § 205(g), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 23 § 405(g), sentence four. On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an 24 25 administrative law judge (ALJ) for a new decision. The Appeals Council will instruct the ALJ to 26 1 27 28 Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on July 9, 2021. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Kilolo Kijakazi should be substituted, therefore, for Andrew Saul as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). STIPULATION TO REMAND; ORDER 1:21-CV-01252-SKO (SS) 1 offer Plaintiff the opportunity of a hearing; reevaluate, with the assistance of a medical expert, if 2 available, the severity of Plaintiff’s fibromyalgia, consistent with SSR 12-2p; to reassess 3 Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity, consistent with 20 CFR 404.1545, SSR 85-15 and SSR 4 96-8p; and proceed with the sequential evaluation. 5 6 The parties further request that the Court direct the Clerk of the Court to enter a final 7 judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Acting 8 Commissioner. 9 Respectfully submitted this 5th day of May 2022. 10 11 Dated: May 5, 2022 /s/ Francesco Paulo Benavides* FRANCESCO PAULO BENAVIDES Attorney for Plaintiff *Authorized via e-mail on May 5, 2022 12 13 14 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney PETER THOMPSON Acting Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 15 16 17 19 /s/ Patrick William Snyder PATRICK WILLIAM SNYDER Special Assistant United States Attorney 20 Attorneys for Defendant 18 By: 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO REMAND; ORDER 1:21-CV-01252-SKO (SS) 1 ORDER 2 Based upon the parties’ foregoing stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence 3 Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (the “Stipulation”) (Doc. 11), and for cause 4 shown, 5 IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Acting 6 Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings pursuant to the Social Security Act § 7 205(g), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. On remand, the Appeals Council will 8 remand the case to an administrative law judge for a new decision in accordance with the parties’ 9 Stipulation. 10 11 The Clerk of Court shall enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, vacating and reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Sheila K. Oberto May 6, 2022 . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO REMAND; ORDER 1:21-CV-01252-SKO (SS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?