Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company v. MRVK Hospitality Group Limited Liability Company, et al.,
Filing
9
ORDER GRANTING plaintiff's request for a continuance of the scheduling conference, document 8 , currently noticed for 12/9/2021, with the new hearing date set for 2/9/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/19/2021. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
ACCEPTANCE CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
v.
13
14
Case No. 1:21-cv-01359-DAD-EPG
MRVK HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, et
al.,
15
(ECF No. 8)
Defendants.
16
This matter is currently set for an initial scheduling conference on December 9, 2021.
17
18
(ECF No. 6). Plaintiff now moves to continue the scheduling conference for a minimum of sixty
19
days. (ECF No. 8). As grounds, Plaintiff asserts that, despite its diligent efforts, it has not been
20
able to serve Defendants and needs an extension of time to do so (which it expects to be able to
21
do shortly) and for the parties to meet and confer and file a joint scheduling conference statement
22
in advance of the scheduling conference.
Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to continue the scheduling
23
24
conference is granted. (ECF No. 8).
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
The initial scheduling conference set for December 9, 2021, is vacated and is now reset
for February 9, 2022, at 10:00 a.m.1
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
November 19, 2021
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
Plaintiff is directed to review Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), and if it deems it necessary, file an
appropriate motion regarding an extension of time for service.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?