U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sunshine Raisin Corporation et al

Filing 96

ORDER Directing Clerk to Close Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 08/28/2024. Court to Retain Jurisdiction to Enforce Consent Decrees. CASE CLOSED. (Maldonado, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

v.

Case No. 1:21-cv-01424-JLT-HBK
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE
CASE
COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO
ENFORCE CONSENT DECREES

SUNSHINE RAISIN CORP. dba National
Raisin Co.; and REAL TIME STAFFING
SERVICES LLC dba Select Staffing,
Defendants.

18

On March 12, 2024, the district court approved Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment

19

Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and Defendant Sunshine Raisin Corporation, doing business

20

as National Raisin Company (“National Raisin”) Consent Decree to fully and finally resolve

21

Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant National Raisin. (Doc. No. 87). Pursuant to the March

22

12, 2024 Order, the court “shall retain jurisdiction over this action for the duration of the Decree

23

for the purposes of entering all orders, judgments, and decrees that may be necessary to fully

24

implement the relief provided” therein. (Id. at 4:1-3).

25

On July 24, 2024, the district court approved the EEOC and Defendant Real Time Staffing

26

Services LLC dba Select Staffing (“Select Staffing”) Consent Decree to fully and finally resolve

27

Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Select Staffing. (Doc. No. 95). Pursuant to the July 24,

28

2024 Order, the court “shall retain jurisdiction over this action for the duration of the Decree for

1

the purposes of entering all orders, judgments and decrees that may be necessary to fully

2

implement the relief provided” therein. (Id. at 3:20-22).
Considering the district court’s approval of the respective Consent Decrees, this matter is

3
4

completely disposed of and entry of judgment by the Clerk of Court is appropriate pursuant to

5

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(b)(2)(B). See United States for use of Tri–City Elec. Co. of

6

Iowa v. Alacran/O & SJV, LLC, No. 4:11CV04109-SLD-JEH, 2014 WL 5473138, at *2 n. 2

7

(C.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2014). As specifically provided by the Court’s March 12, 2024 and July 24,

8

2024 Orders, the Court retains ancillary jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the relief provided

9

in the respective Consent Decrees. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S.

10

375, 380-82(1994).

11

ACCORDINGLY, the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff pursuant to

12

the district court’s approval of the Consent Decrees, terminate all pending deadlines, CLOSE this

13

action, and note the Court retains ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the respective Consent Decrees.

14
15
16

Dated:

August 28, 2024
HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2