(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer et al

Filing 171

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 170 Motion for Issuance of Subpoena as Untimely signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/29/2024. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADAM JAY STONE, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. C. PFEIFFER, et al., No. 1:21-cv-01461-KES-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS AS UNTIMELY (ECF No. 170) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants 19 B. Gonzales, G. Morales, K. Gonzales, and Anderson in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 20 21 22 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for the issuance of subpoenas, filed August 28, 2024. Plaintiff’s request is untimely. The Court issued the initial discovery and scheduling order on November 22, 2022. (ECF 23 No. 59.) On June 7, 2023, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to stay and reset the pending 24 deadlines until a final ruling on Defendant Anderson’s exhaustion motion for summary judgment, 25 which included briefing on Plaintiff’s pending motion to compel. (ECF No. 93.) 26 27 28 On September 27, 2023, the Court set this case for a settlement conference at Corcoran State Prison on November 6, 2023, but the case did not settle. (ECF Nos. 117, 123.) On October 25, 2023, Defendant Anderson’s exhaustion motion for summary judgment 1 1 was denied. (ECF No. 122.) 2 On November 8, 2023, the Court lifted the stay of discovery, directed Defendants to file a 3 response to Plaintiff’s pending motions to compel within thirty days, and extended the discovery 4 deadline to February 6, 2024 and dispositive motion filing deadline to May 6, 2024. (ECF No. 5 125.) On April 23, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to modify the discovery and 6 7 scheduling order and extended the discovery deadline to June 25, 2024. (ECF No. 154.) The 8 extended discovery phase for this case closed on June 25, 2024 and has not been further extended. 9 Indeed, the Court denied Plaintiff’s most recent request to extend the discovery deadline on 10 August 9, 2024. (ECF No. 167.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for the issuance of subpoenas is 11 DENIED as UNTIMELY. 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 29, 2024 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?