Mallard-Warren v. Saint Agnes Medical Center et al
Filing
13
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO ESTABLISH RELATED DEADLINES. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/11/2022. Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 1/25/2022 is CONTINUED to 4/7/2022 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
LOWELL C. BROWN (SBN 108253)
lowell.brown@arentfox.com
DIANE ROLDÁN (SBN 288224)
diane.roldan@arentfox.com
ARENT FOX LLP
555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013-1065
Telephone: 213.629.7400
Facsimile: 213.629.7401
Attorneys for Defendant SAINT AGNES
MEDICAL CENTER MEDICAL STAFF
DANIEL HOROWITZ (SBN 92400)
horowitz@physiciandefense.lawyer
LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL HOROWITZ
3650 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Ste. 225
Lafayette, CA 94549
Telephone: (925) 283-1863
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GAIL MALLARD-WARREN, M.D.
[Additional Counsel Listed on Next Page]
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
16
17
GAIL MALLARD-WARREN, M.D.,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
v.
SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER,
THE MEDICAL STAFF OF SAINT
AGNES MEDICAL CENTER and
TRINITY HEALTH INC., NANCY
HOLLINGSWORTH, and DOES 1-100,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:21−CV−01530−JLT−SKO
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION
TO EXTEND TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND
TO ESTABLISH RELATED
DEADLINES
(Doc. 10)
(E.D. L.R. 144(a))
ORDER CONTINUING
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
26
27
28
ARENT FOX LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
Courtroom: 4
Trial Date: None Set
Date Action Filed:
10/15/21
˗1˗
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO ESTABLISH RELATED DEADLINES
1
[Additional Counsel from Prior Page:]
2
CHARLES BOND (SBN 60611)
cb@physiciansadvocates.com
PHYSICIANS’ ADVOCATES
2033 N. Main St., Ste. 340
Walnut Creek, Ca 94596
Telephone: (510) 841-7500
cb@physiciansadvocates.com
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
KARINA JOHNSON (SBN 243099)
kjohnsonlaw@outlook.com
c/o PHYSICIANS ADVOCATES
2033 N. Main St., Ste. 340
Walnut Creek, Ca 94596
Telephone: (510) 841-7500
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GAIL MALLARD-WARREN, M.D.
WILLIAM C. HAHESY (SBN 105743)
bill@hahesylaw.com
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY
5260 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 400
Fresno, CA 93704
Telephone (559) 579-1230
Attorney for Defendants SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER, TRINITY
HEALTH CORPORATION, erroneously sued as TRINITY HEALTH INC., AND
NANCY HOLLINGSWORTH
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARENT FOX LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
˗2˗
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO ESTABLISH RELATED DEADLINES
1
ORDER
2
The Court having considered the parties’ stipulation to extend time for
3
4
5
Defendants to file responsive pleadings and to establish related deadlines,
(“Stipulation”) (Doc. 10) and for good cause shown, HEREBY ORDERS AS
FOLLOWS:
6
7
February 7, 2022.
8
9
2.
3.
14
15
The deadline for Defendants to file an anti-SLAPP motion, if any, to
the FAC shall be 60 days from the date the FAC is filed.
12
13
Defendants shall file any responsive pleadings within 30 days after the
FAC is filed.
10
11
Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on or before
1.
4.
The Initial Scheduling Conference, currently set for January 25, 2022,
is CONTINUED to April 7, 2022, at 10:15 AM, before Magistrate Judge Sheila K.
Oberto. The parties SHALL file their joint scheduling report 7 days prior to the
conference.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
Dated:
19
January 11, 2022
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARENT FOX LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
˗3˗
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO ESTABLISH RELATED DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?