Mallard-Warren v. Saint Agnes Medical Center et al

Filing 13

ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO ESTABLISH RELATED DEADLINES. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/11/2022. Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 1/25/2022 is CONTINUED to 4/7/2022 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 LOWELL C. BROWN (SBN 108253) lowell.brown@arentfox.com DIANE ROLDÁN (SBN 288224) diane.roldan@arentfox.com ARENT FOX LLP 555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90013-1065 Telephone: 213.629.7400 Facsimile: 213.629.7401 Attorneys for Defendant SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER MEDICAL STAFF DANIEL HOROWITZ (SBN 92400) horowitz@physiciandefense.lawyer LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL HOROWITZ 3650 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Ste. 225 Lafayette, CA 94549 Telephone: (925) 283-1863 Attorneys for Plaintiff GAIL MALLARD-WARREN, M.D. [Additional Counsel Listed on Next Page] 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION 16 17 GAIL MALLARD-WARREN, M.D., Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 v. SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER, THE MEDICAL STAFF OF SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER and TRINITY HEALTH INC., NANCY HOLLINGSWORTH, and DOES 1-100, Defendants. Case No. 1:21−CV−01530−JLT−SKO ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO ESTABLISH RELATED DEADLINES (Doc. 10) (E.D. L.R. 144(a)) ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 26 27 28 ARENT FOX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO Courtroom: 4 Trial Date: None Set Date Action Filed: 10/15/21 ˗1˗ ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO ESTABLISH RELATED DEADLINES 1 [Additional Counsel from Prior Page:] 2 CHARLES BOND (SBN 60611) cb@physiciansadvocates.com PHYSICIANS’ ADVOCATES 2033 N. Main St., Ste. 340 Walnut Creek, Ca 94596 Telephone: (510) 841-7500 cb@physiciansadvocates.com 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 KARINA JOHNSON (SBN 243099) kjohnsonlaw@outlook.com c/o PHYSICIANS ADVOCATES 2033 N. Main St., Ste. 340 Walnut Creek, Ca 94596 Telephone: (510) 841-7500 Attorneys for Plaintiff GAIL MALLARD-WARREN, M.D. WILLIAM C. HAHESY (SBN 105743) bill@hahesylaw.com LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY 5260 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 400 Fresno, CA 93704 Telephone (559) 579-1230 Attorney for Defendants SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER, TRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION, erroneously sued as TRINITY HEALTH INC., AND NANCY HOLLINGSWORTH 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ARENT FOX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO ˗2˗ ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO ESTABLISH RELATED DEADLINES 1 ORDER 2 The Court having considered the parties’ stipulation to extend time for 3 4 5 Defendants to file responsive pleadings and to establish related deadlines, (“Stipulation”) (Doc. 10) and for good cause shown, HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 6 7 February 7, 2022. 8 9 2. 3. 14 15 The deadline for Defendants to file an anti-SLAPP motion, if any, to the FAC shall be 60 days from the date the FAC is filed. 12 13 Defendants shall file any responsive pleadings within 30 days after the FAC is filed. 10 11 Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on or before 1. 4. The Initial Scheduling Conference, currently set for January 25, 2022, is CONTINUED to April 7, 2022, at 10:15 AM, before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties SHALL file their joint scheduling report 7 days prior to the conference. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: 19 January 11, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ARENT FOX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO ˗3˗ ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO ESTABLISH RELATED DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?