Angelo et al v. Thomson International, Incorporated
Filing
82
ORDER on 80 Stipulation Modifying Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 11/14/2023. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ASHLEIGH ANGELO, et al.,
9
10
11
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 1:21-cv-01609-JLT-CDB
ORDER ON STIPULATION MODIFYING
SCHEDULING ORDER
(Doc. 80)
THOMSON INTERNATIONAL
INCORPORATED,
12
Defendant.
13
14
Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulated request to modify the scheduling order
15
to the extent of facilitating previously noticed depositions and extending the non-dispositive
16
motion filing deadline relating to those depositions, filed November 13, 2023. (Doc. 80). The
17
parties filed their stipulation pursuant to Court order in connection with resolution of a discovery
18
dispute. (Docs. 78, 79).
19
For good cause shown during the discovery dispute conference and in the parties’
20
stipulation representations, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the scheduling order is modified to
21
the following extent:
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1. The deadline to complete the deposition of Plaintiff James Thompson with an ASL
interpreter is extended to December 4, 2023.
2. The deadline to complete the expert deposition of Dr. Daniel Wallace is extended to
November 29, 2023.
3. The deadline to complete the expert deposition of Dr. Martin Wiedmann is extended
to November 30, 2023.
4. The deadline to complete the expert deposition of Dr. Melvin Kramer is extended to
1
2
December 15, 2023.
The date by which any non-dispositive motion related to any of the above-referenced
3
depositions must be filed shall be six court days after the deposition deadlines identified above.
4
All other existing case management dates remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 14, 2023
___________________
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?