Orozco et al v. FCA US LLC et al

Filing 62

ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/29/2024. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' request for dismissal is HEREBY DISREGARDED. Plaintiffs shall file a request for dismissal of this action that complies with Rule 41 within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this order. (Nguyen, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISIDRO OROZCO, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01674-SAB ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Plaintiffs, 12 13 v. 14 FCA US, LLC, (ECF No. 61) FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiffs filed this action on November 19, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On February 24, 2022, 18 Defendant filed its answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 10.) On August 28, 2024, Plaintiffs filed 19 a request for dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF 20 No. 61.) The request was filed as a “motion to dismiss” and is signed only by Plaintiffs. (Id. at 21 2.) 22 Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “a plaintiff has an 23 absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a 24 motion for summary judgment.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 25 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 26 1997)). 27 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a “plaintiff 28 may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all 1 1 parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). “As the express language of this 2 rule indicates, for a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) to be effective, all parties who have 3 appeared must sign the stipulation.” Aswad v. ACA Receivables, L.L.C., No. 4 CIVF060835AWILJO, 2007 WL 427591, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2007) (emphasis added). A party may also dismiss an action by filing a motion requesting the Court to dismiss the 5 6 action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) is 7 addressed to the sound discretion of the district court. Hamilton v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. 8 Inc., 679 F.2d 143, 145 (9th Cir. 1982). Plaintiffs’ request for dismissal is defective under Rule 41(a) because it is not a signed 9 10 stipulation by all parties who have appeared, and it is not a motion under Rule 41(a)(2). If 11 Plaintiffs wish to dismiss this action, they are required to comply with the procedures set forth in 12 Rule 41 by either filing a stipulation that complies with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) or a motion under 13 Rule 41(a)(2) that complies with Local Rule 230. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ request for dismissal is HEREBY DISREGARDED. Plaintiffs 14 15 shall file a request for dismissal of this action that complies with Rule 41 within fourteen (14) 16 days from the date of entry of this order. 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: August 29, 2024 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?