(PC) Crossley v. Well Path Medical et al
Filing
4
ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP without Prejudice; ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 01/07/2022. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application Form)(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT LAMOUNT CROSSLEY,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
WELL PATH MEDICAL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
Case No. 1:22-cv-00024-BAM (PC)
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 2.)
16
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
COMPLETED APPLICATION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE
17
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
18
19
Plaintiff Robert Lamount Crossley (“Plaintiff”) is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se
20
in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 5, 2022, Plaintiff filed a
21
motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) The application was incomplete. Plaintiff
22
has failed to complete the certificate portion of the application, or to include a certified copy of
23
his trust account statement for the past six months.
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 2), is DENIED without
prejudice;
2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file the
attached application to proceed in forma pauperis, completed and signed, or in the
1
1
alternative, pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action;
2
3. No extension of time will be granted without a showing of good cause; and
3
4. The failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action without
4
prejudice.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
January 7, 2022
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?